How technology has changed diabetes management and what it has failed to achieve

被引:4
|
作者
Ratheau, L. [1 ]
Jeandidier, N. [1 ]
Moreau, F. [1 ]
Sigrist, S. [2 ]
Pinget, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, NUS, Dept Endocrinol, Pole NUDE, Strasbourg, France
[2] CeeD, Strasbourg, France
关键词
Type; 1; diabetes; Diabetes technology evolution; Continuous insulin infusion; Continuous glucose monitoring; Sensors; Review; SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION; MULTIPLE DAILY INJECTIONS; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; BOLUS CALCULATOR; PUMP THERAPY; TYPE-1;
D O I
10.1016/S1262-3636(11)70967-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tremendous improvements have modified diabetes management from pure clinical diagnosis and the discovery of insulin to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) coupled with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to allow patients to adapt insulin delivery to glycaemia on a virtually "real-time" basis. Insulin was first discovered in 1923 and, in less than a century, it has been purified, humanized and now synthesized by genetically modified microorganisms. Insulin analogue, kinetics and reproducibility now allow near-normal glycaemia to be targeted without increasing hypoglycaemia, thus allowing greater flexibility in the patient's day-to-day life. In addition, advances have been made over the past few decades in the development of the necessary and complementary technologies for insulin infusion, glucose measurement, glucose insulin interaction and telemedicine. The major remaining limitations are the lack of glycaemic regulation on insulin administration and the burden of parenteral delivery. Thus, the dream of both patients and diabetologists is to close the loop and to build an artificial pancreas. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S57 / S64
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A decade of FRAX: how has it changed the management of osteoporosis?
    Kanis, John A.
    Harvey, Nicholas C.
    Johansson, Helena
    Liu, Enwu
    Vandenput, Liesbeth
    Lorentzon, Mattias
    Leslie, William D.
    McCloskey, Eugene V.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [22] What has changed? The Impact of Covid Pandemic on the Technology and Innovation Management Research Agenda
    George, Gerard
    Lakhani, Karim R.
    Puranam, Phanish
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2020, 57 (08) : 1754 - 1758
  • [23] A decade of FRAX: how has it changed the management of osteoporosis?
    John A. Kanis
    Nicholas C. Harvey
    Helena Johansson
    Enwu Liu
    Liesbeth Vandenput
    Mattias Lorentzon
    William D. Leslie
    Eugene V. McCloskey
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2020, 32 : 187 - 196
  • [24] STINGING INSECT ALLERGY - HOW MANAGEMENT HAS CHANGED
    GRAFT, DF
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1989, 85 (08) : 173 - &
  • [25] But what has really changed?
    Schwink, FW
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH AND GERMANIC PHILOLOGY, 2005, 104 (03): : 385 - 393
  • [26] WHAT, IF ANYTHING, HAS CHANGED?
    不详
    SUMARSKI LIST, 2017, 141 (3-4):
  • [27] ASKED WHAT HAS CHANGED
    Joseph, Nick
    GEORGIA REVIEW, 2022, 76 (02): : 624 - 629
  • [28] What has changed with riluzole?
    V. Meininger
    L. Lacomblez
    F. Salachas
    Journal of Neurology, 2000, 247 (Suppl 6) : VI19 - VI22
  • [29] What has changed with riluzole?
    Meininger, V
    Lacomblez, L
    Salachas, F
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2000, 247 : 19 - 22
  • [30] Indeed, what has changed!
    S. Bruce Greenberg
    Pediatric Radiology, 2012, 42 : 386 - 386