First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis

被引:36
作者
Mahmud, Ehtisham [1 ]
Dominguez, Arturo [1 ]
Bahadorani, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sulpizio Cardiovasc Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
interventional devices; innovation; left main coronary disease; mechanical circulatory support; ECMO; IABP; Tandem; Impella; percutaneous coronary intervention; Complex PCI; CLINICAL-TRIAL; IMPELLA; 2.5; ANGIOGRAPHY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.26550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The safety and feasibility of robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for simple coronary lesions has been demonstrated. The CorPath robotic system (Corpath 200, Corindus, Waltham, MA) consists of a robotic arm mounted on the cardiac catheterization table that consists of a drive housing a single-use sterile cassette, which is connected to the guiding catheter. While sitting in the nonsterile, radiation-shielded cockpit, the operator remotely controls delivery and removal of coronary guidewires, angioplasty balloons, and stents. The database for the ongoing PRECISION registry was queried at a single center and results of unprotected left main robotic PCI procedures are reported. Of 102 robotic PCI procedures performed at this center, 6 were unprotected left main lesions (age 69 +/- 14 years; 67% male). All 6 subjects underwent successful PCI (fluoroscopy time 26.8 +/- 11.4 min;1.8 stents and 2.2 vessels treated/patient) with three requiring hemodynamic support (two with percutaneous left ventricular assistance using the Impella 2.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) and one with intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation). This report demonstrates the feasibility of performing robotically assisted unprotected left main PCI with or without hemodynamic support. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 570
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions - Concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial [J].
Beyar, R ;
Gruberg, L ;
Deleanu, D ;
Roguin, A ;
Almagor, Y ;
Cohen, S ;
Kumar, G ;
Wenderow, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) :296-300
[2]   The occupational effects of interventional cardiology: results from the WIN for Safety survey [J].
Buchanan, Gill Louise ;
Chieffo, Alaide ;
Mehilli, Julinda ;
Mikhail, Ghada W. ;
Mauri, Fina ;
Presbitero, Patrizia ;
Grinfeld, Liliana ;
Petronio, Anna Sonia ;
Skelding, Kimberly A. ;
Hoye, Angela ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Morice, Marie-Claude .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (06) :658-663
[3]   Determinants of Fluoroscopy Time for Invasive Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the NCDR® [J].
Fazel, Reza ;
Curtis, Jeptha ;
Wang, Yongfei ;
Einstein, Andrew J. ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Tsai, Thomas T. ;
Chen, Jersey ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. ;
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 82 (07) :1091-1105
[4]   Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice [J].
Goldstein, JA ;
Baiter, S ;
Cowley, M ;
Hodgson, J ;
Klein, LW .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) :407-411
[5]   Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry [J].
Maini, Brijeshwar ;
Naidu, Srihari S. ;
Mulukutla, Suresh ;
Kleiman, Neal ;
Schreiber, Theodore ;
Wohns, David ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Rihal, Charanjit ;
Dave, Rajesh ;
O'Neill, William .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (05) :717-725
[6]   Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization An Expert Consensus Document From the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) [J].
Moussa, Issam D. ;
Klein, Lloyd W. ;
Shah, Binita ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Mack, Michael J. ;
Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ;
Reilly, John P. ;
Zoghbi, Gilbert ;
Holper, Elizabeth ;
Stone, Gregg W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (17) :1563-1570
[7]  
Nikolsky Eugenia, 2007, J Invasive Cardiol, V19, P208
[8]   A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study [J].
O'Neill, William W. ;
Kleiman, Neal S. ;
Moses, Jeffrey ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Massaro, Joseph ;
Palacios, Igor ;
Maini, Brijeshwar ;
Mulukutla, Suresh ;
Dzavik, Vladimir ;
Popma, Jeffrey ;
Douglas, Pamela S. ;
Ohman, Magnus .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (14) :1717-+
[9]   Invasive Cardiologists Are Exposed to Greater Left Sided Cranial Radiation The BRAIN Study (Brain Radiation Exposure and Attenuation During Invasive Cardiology Procedures) [J].
Reeves, Ryan R. ;
Ang, Lawrence ;
Bahadorani, John ;
Naghi, Jesse ;
Dominguez, Arturo ;
Palakodeti, Vachaspathi ;
Tsimikas, Sotirios ;
Patel, Mitul P. ;
Mahmud, Ehtisham .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (09) :1197-1206
[10]   Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry [J].
Sjauw, Krischan D. ;
Konorza, Thomas ;
Erbel, Raimund ;
Danna, Paolo L. ;
Viecca, Maurizio ;
Minden, Hans-Heinrich ;
Butter, Christian ;
Engstrom, Thomas ;
Hassager, Christian ;
Machado, Francisco P. ;
Pedrazzini, Giovanni ;
Wagner, Daniel R. ;
Schamberger, Rainer ;
Kerber, Sebastian ;
Mathey, Detlef G. ;
Schofer, Joachim ;
Engstrom, Annemarie E. ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) :2430-2434