First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis

被引:34
作者
Mahmud, Ehtisham [1 ]
Dominguez, Arturo [1 ]
Bahadorani, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sulpizio Cardiovasc Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
interventional devices; innovation; left main coronary disease; mechanical circulatory support; ECMO; IABP; Tandem; Impella; percutaneous coronary intervention; Complex PCI; CLINICAL-TRIAL; IMPELLA; 2.5; ANGIOGRAPHY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.26550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The safety and feasibility of robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for simple coronary lesions has been demonstrated. The CorPath robotic system (Corpath 200, Corindus, Waltham, MA) consists of a robotic arm mounted on the cardiac catheterization table that consists of a drive housing a single-use sterile cassette, which is connected to the guiding catheter. While sitting in the nonsterile, radiation-shielded cockpit, the operator remotely controls delivery and removal of coronary guidewires, angioplasty balloons, and stents. The database for the ongoing PRECISION registry was queried at a single center and results of unprotected left main robotic PCI procedures are reported. Of 102 robotic PCI procedures performed at this center, 6 were unprotected left main lesions (age 69 +/- 14 years; 67% male). All 6 subjects underwent successful PCI (fluoroscopy time 26.8 +/- 11.4 min;1.8 stents and 2.2 vessels treated/patient) with three requiring hemodynamic support (two with percutaneous left ventricular assistance using the Impella 2.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) and one with intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation). This report demonstrates the feasibility of performing robotically assisted unprotected left main PCI with or without hemodynamic support. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 570
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions - Concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial
    Beyar, R
    Gruberg, L
    Deleanu, D
    Roguin, A
    Almagor, Y
    Cohen, S
    Kumar, G
    Wenderow, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) : 296 - 300
  • [2] The occupational effects of interventional cardiology: results from the WIN for Safety survey
    Buchanan, Gill Louise
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Mikhail, Ghada W.
    Mauri, Fina
    Presbitero, Patrizia
    Grinfeld, Liliana
    Petronio, Anna Sonia
    Skelding, Kimberly A.
    Hoye, Angela
    Mehran, Roxana
    Morice, Marie-Claude
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (06) : 658 - 663
  • [3] Determinants of Fluoroscopy Time for Invasive Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the NCDR®
    Fazel, Reza
    Curtis, Jeptha
    Wang, Yongfei
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Tsai, Thomas T.
    Chen, Jersey
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 82 (07) : 1091 - 1105
  • [4] Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice
    Goldstein, JA
    Baiter, S
    Cowley, M
    Hodgson, J
    Klein, LW
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [5] Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Mulukutla, Suresh
    Kleiman, Neal
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Wohns, David
    Dixon, Simon
    Rihal, Charanjit
    Dave, Rajesh
    O'Neill, William
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (05) : 717 - 725
  • [6] Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization An Expert Consensus Document From the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)
    Moussa, Issam D.
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    Shah, Binita
    Mehran, Roxana
    Mack, Michael J.
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Reilly, John P.
    Zoghbi, Gilbert
    Holper, Elizabeth
    Stone, Gregg W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (17) : 1563 - 1570
  • [7] Nikolsky Eugenia, 2007, J Invasive Cardiol, V19, P208
  • [8] A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study
    O'Neill, William W.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Dixon, Simon
    Massaro, Joseph
    Palacios, Igor
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    Mulukutla, Suresh
    Dzavik, Vladimir
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Ohman, Magnus
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (14) : 1717 - +
  • [9] Invasive Cardiologists Are Exposed to Greater Left Sided Cranial Radiation The BRAIN Study (Brain Radiation Exposure and Attenuation During Invasive Cardiology Procedures)
    Reeves, Ryan R.
    Ang, Lawrence
    Bahadorani, John
    Naghi, Jesse
    Dominguez, Arturo
    Palakodeti, Vachaspathi
    Tsimikas, Sotirios
    Patel, Mitul P.
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (09) : 1197 - 1206
  • [10] Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Konorza, Thomas
    Erbel, Raimund
    Danna, Paolo L.
    Viecca, Maurizio
    Minden, Hans-Heinrich
    Butter, Christian
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Hassager, Christian
    Machado, Francisco P.
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Wagner, Daniel R.
    Schamberger, Rainer
    Kerber, Sebastian
    Mathey, Detlef G.
    Schofer, Joachim
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) : 2430 - 2434