Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks

被引:10896
作者
McPherson, M [1 ]
Smith-Lovin, L
Cook, JM
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Sociol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
human ecology; voluntary associations; organizations;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Similarity breeds connection. This principle-the homophily principle-structures network ties of every type, including marriage, friendship, work, advice, support, information transfer, exchange, comembership, and other types of relationship. The result is that people's personal networks are homogeneous with regard to many sociodemographic, behavioral, and intrapersonal characteristics. Homophily limits people's social worlds in a way that has powerful implications for the information they receive, the attitudes they form, and the interactions they experience. Homophily in race and ethnicity creates the strongest divides in our personal environments, with age, religion, education, occupation, and gender following in roughly that order. Geographic propinquity, families, organizations, and isomorphic positions in social systems all create contexts in which homophilous relations form. Ties between nonsimilar individuals also dissolve at a higher rate, which sets the stage for the formation of niches (localized positions) within social space. We argue for more research on: (a) the basic ecological processes that link organizations, associations, cultural communities, social movements, and many other social forms; (b) the impact of multiplex ties on the patterns of homophily; and (c) the dynamics of network change over time through which networks and other social entities co-evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 444
页数:30
相关论文
共 153 条
[71]   A FORMAL MODEL OF CHURCH AND SECT [J].
IANNACCONE, LR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1988, 94 :S241-S268
[72]   Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks [J].
Ibarra, H .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1997, 60 (01) :91-102
[74]  
IBARRA H, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P673, DOI 10.5465/256742
[75]  
Ibarra H., 1997, Creating tomorrow's organizations, P359
[76]   INFLUENCE AND SIMILARITY AMONG FRIENDS - AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL APPLIED TO INCARCERATED ADOLESCENTS [J].
JUSSIM, L ;
OSGOOD, DW .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1989, 52 (02) :98-112
[77]  
Kalleberg AL, 1996, Organizations in America: Analysing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices
[78]   Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends [J].
Kalmijn, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1998, 24 :395-421
[79]   HOMOPHILY, SELECTION, AND SOCIALIZATION IN ADOLESCENT FRIENDSHIPS [J].
KANDEL, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1978, 84 (02) :427-436
[80]   DEVIANT PEERS AND DEVIANT-BEHAVIOR - FURTHER ELABORATION OF A MODEL [J].
KAPLAN, HB ;
JOHNSON, RJ ;
BAILEY, CA .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1987, 50 (03) :277-284