Health, economic evaluation, and critical care

被引:9
作者
Alsarraf, AA
Fowler, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
health care; economic evaluation; critical care medicine;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.05.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In the past 2 decades, societal spending on health care has become an international concern. The United States currently spends more than 1.6 trillion dollars per year on health care approximately 15% of the gross domestic product. The provision of care to critically ill patients accounts for a disproportionate share of these health care dollars-approximately 13% of hospital costs, 4% of national health expenditures, and 0.5% to 1% of the gross domestic product. This enormous investment necessitates careful evaluation of our interventions and their associated expense. Economic evaluation can aid policy makers and health care professionals in comparing the relative and incremental value of disparate and expensive therapies and also inform decisions about which interventions provide good value for the health care dollar. In this review, we will highlight landmark publications over the past 3 decades that have helped to shape the field of economic evaluation for critical care medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 197
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An economic evaluation of occupational health
    Miller, P
    Whynes, D
    Reid, A
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2000, 50 (03): : 159 - 163
  • [42] Health economic evaluation in Greece
    Rovithis, Dimitrios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 22 (03) : 388 - 395
  • [43] NEW TECHNOLOGIES, CRITICAL CARE, AND ECONOMIC REALITIES
    SIBBALD, WJ
    EBERHARD, JA
    INMAN, KJ
    SPRUNG, CL
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (11) : 1777 - 1780
  • [44] UNCERTAINTY IN THE ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF HEALTH-CARE TECHNOLOGIES - THE ROLE OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    BRIGGS, A
    SCULPHER, M
    BUXTON, M
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1994, 3 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [45] The distribution problem in economic evaluation: income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes
    Donaldson, C
    Birch, S
    Gafni, A
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (01) : 55 - 70
  • [46] Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
    Bertram, Melanie Y.
    Lauer, Jeremy A.
    Stenberg, Karin
    Edejer, Tesa Tan Trres
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 10 (11) : 673 - 677
  • [47] A Study on Economic Evaluation of an Outreach Health-Care Facility in Jhajjar District of Haryana: Service Delivery Model for Increasing Access to Health Care
    Kausar, Mohammad
    Siddharth, Vijaydeep
    Gupta, Shakti Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 65 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [48] Health economics, economic evaluation, and glaucoma
    Kobelt, G
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2002, 11 (06) : 531 - 539
  • [49] Viewpoint: Economic evaluation of package of care interventions employing clinical guidelines
    Barasa, Edwine W.
    English, Mike
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2011, 16 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [50] Methods of Health Economic Evaluation for Health Services Research
    Icks, A.
    Chernyak, N.
    Bestehorn, K.
    Brueggenjuergen, B.
    Bruns, J.
    Dame, O.
    Dintsios, C. -M.
    Dreinhoefer, K.
    Gandjour, A.
    Gerber, A.
    Greiner, W.
    Hermanek, P.
    Hessel, F.
    Heymann, R.
    Huppertz, E.
    Jacke, C.
    Kaechele, H.
    Kilian, R.
    Klingenberger, D.
    Kolominsky-Rabas, P.
    Kraemer, H.
    Krauth, C.
    Luengen, M.
    Neumann, T.
    Porzsolt, F.
    Prenzler, A.
    Pueschner, F.
    Riedel, R.
    Ruether, A.
    Salize, H. J.
    Scharnetzky, E.
    Schwerd, W.
    Selbmann, H. -K.
    Siebert, H.
    Stengel, D.
    Stock, S.
    Voeller, H.
    Wasem, J.
    Schrappe, M.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2010, 72 (12) : 917 - 933