Differentiation of Benign From Malignant Liver Masses With Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technique

被引:66
作者
Yu, Hojun [1 ]
Wilson, Stephanie R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
关键词
liver masses; elastography; Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse; TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY; IN-VIVO; PROSTATE-CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; FIBROSIS; US; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318239422e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging to differentiate benign from malignant liver masses, both of hepatocellular origin and metastases, by quantification of their stiffness. Methods: This study has institutional review board approval and informed consent. Eighty-nine patients (42 female and 47 male patients) with 105 liver masses had ARFI evaluation on ultrasound, S2000 (Siemens, Mountain View, Calif). Mean age of the patients was 53.67 years (range, 27-83 years). Mean diameter of the masses was 2.77 cm (range, 1.0-13.0 cm). Final diagnoses, confirmed by imaging on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or ultrasound or biopsy, include hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 28), metastasis (n = 13), hemangioma (n = 35), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 15), focal fat sparing (n = 8), focal fat deposit (n = 4), and adenoma (n = 2). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ARFI measurement and to extract the optimal cutoff values in the differentiation of benign from malignant disease. Results: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse values showed a statistically significant difference between benign (1.73 [SD, 0.8] m/sec) and malignant masses (2.57 [SD, 1.01] m/sec) (P < 0.001). However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.744, suggesting only fair accuracy. For differentiation of malignant from benign masses, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 68% (28/41), 69% (44/64), 58% (28/48), and 77% (44/57), respectively, when 1.9 m/sec was chosen as a cutoff value, reflective of a wide variation of ARFI values in each diagnosis. For differentiation of metastasis from benign masses, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV were 69% (9/13), 89% (57/64), 56% (9/16), and 93% (57/61), respectively, when 2.72 m/sec was chosen as a cutoff value. Conclusions: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse measurement may be helpful to differentiate benign masses from metastases, in particular. Otherwise, ARFI measurements alone do not differentiate benign and malignant masses because of variations in stiffness of all types of masses.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging [J].
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Hall, Timothy J. ;
Sommer, Amy M. ;
Hesley, Gina K. ;
Sisney, Gale A. ;
Svensson, William E. ;
Fine, Jason P. ;
Jiang, Jinfeng ;
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (02) :401-410
[2]   ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE IMPULSE ELASTOGRAPHY FOR THE EVALUATION OF FOCAL SOLID HEPATIC LESIONS: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS [J].
Cho, Seung Hyun ;
Lee, Jae Young ;
Han, Joon Koo ;
Choi, Byung Ihn .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 36 (02) :202-208
[3]   In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography [J].
Fahey, B. J. ;
Nelson, R. C. ;
Bradway, D. P. ;
Hsu, S. J. ;
Dumont, D. M. ;
Trahey, G. E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (01) :279-293
[4]   Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis [J].
Friedrich-Rust, Mireen ;
Ong, Mei-Fang ;
Martens, Swantje ;
Sarrazin, Christoph ;
Bojunga, Joerg ;
Zeuzem, Stefan ;
Herrmann, Eva .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) :960-974
[5]   Liver Fibrosis in Viral Hepatitis: Noninvasive Assessment with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging versus Transient Elastography [J].
Friedrich-Rust, Mireen ;
Wunder, Katrin ;
Kriener, Susanne ;
Sotoudeh, Fariba ;
Richter, Swantje ;
Bojunga, Joerg ;
Herrmann, Eva ;
Poynard, Thierry ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. ;
Vermehren, Johannes ;
Zeuzem, Stefan ;
Sarrazin, Christoph .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (02) :595-604
[6]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[7]   Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions:: Clinical results [J].
Hiltawsky, KM ;
Krüger, M ;
Starke, C ;
Heuser, L ;
Ermert, H ;
Jensen, A .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 27 (11) :1461-1469
[8]   Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis [J].
Itoh, A ;
Ueno, E ;
Tohno, E ;
Kamma, H ;
Takahashi, H ;
Shiina, T ;
Yamakawa, M ;
Matsumura, T .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) :341-350
[9]  
Jang HJ, 2007, J ULTRAS MED, V26, P788
[10]   Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with histologic differentiation [J].
Jang, Hyun-Jung ;
Kim, Tae Kyoung ;
Burns, Peter N. ;
Wilson, Stephanie R. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) :898-906