共 50 条
Improving the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Chronic Pain by Stimulating Body Awareness A Cluster-randomized Trial
被引:31
作者:
Van der Maas, Lia C. C.
[1
,3
,4
,5
]
Koke, Albere
[8
]
Pont, Menno
[3
]
Bosscher, Ruud J.
[2
]
Twisk, Jos W. R.
[6
,7
]
Janssen, Thomas W. J.
[4
,5
]
Peters, Madelon L.
[9
]
机构:
[1] Univ Appl Sci Windesheim, Human Movement & Educ Div, NL-8000 GB Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Univ Appl Sci Windesheim, Hlth Care & Social Work Div, NL-8000 GB Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Reade, Ctr Rehabil & Rheumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Rehabil Res Ctr Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] MOVE Res Inst Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Adelante Expertise Ctr Pain Rehabil, Hoensbroek, Netherlands
[9] Maastricht Univ, Dept Clin Psychol Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词:
health-related quality of life;
body awareness;
psychomotor therapy;
chronic pain;
rehabilitation;
COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT;
CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN;
SELF-EFFICACY QUESTIONNAIRE;
BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY;
GROUP LEARNING-PROGRAM;
CATASTROPHIZING SCALE;
DISABILITY;
CONSTRUCT;
THERAPY;
QUALITY;
D O I:
10.1097/AJP.0000000000000138
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Background:Because of methodological flaws and a lack of theoretical foundation of body awareness (BA) in previous effect studies of interventions directed to stimulate BA, it is impossible to attribute treatment effects to this specific component of a multidisciplinary treatment. Therefore, this study evaluated short-term and long-term effects of a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program with and without psychomotor therapy (PMT), which focused on BA (measured by the scale of body connection) as a primary target of intervention.Methods:Ninety-four patients clustered in 20 treatment groups were cluster randomized, using a biased-coin design, to multidisciplinary treatment as usual with or without PMT. Outcome variables were health-related quality of life, disability, and depression. BA, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy were measured as potential process variables. Assessments were performed at baseline, directly after treatment, and at 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups. The data were analyzed by linear mixed-model analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle.Results:Data of all 94 patients were used for analyses. After treatment, significant differences favoring PMT were found between conditions on depression (regression coefficient [RC]=-5.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.81 to -1.21), BA (RC=0.23; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.42) and catastrophizing (RC=-4.76; 95% CI, -8.03 to -1.48). These differences were no longer significant for depression at the 3-month follow-up and for catastrophizing at the 6-month follow-up.Conclusions:No clinical meaningful differences were found between treatment conditions in the primary outcome measures health-related quality of life and disability. However, this is the first long-term RCT that has shown that PMT improves BA in patients with chronic pain and shows good effect size and a significant decrease for catastrophizing.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 669
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条