Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years

被引:43
作者
Barie, Alexander [1 ]
Sprinckstub, Thomas [2 ]
Huber, Jurgen [3 ]
Jaber, Ayham [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Clin Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ctr Orthoped Trauma Surg & Spinal Cord Injury, Schlierbacher Landstr 200a, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Ctr Surg B Nimis & Dr T Sprinckstub, Heide 4, D-69168 Wiesloch, Germany
[3] Ctr Orthoped Knee, Hopfenstr 4, D-69469 Weinheim, Germany
关键词
Press-fit fixation; ACL reconstruction; Patellar tendon; Quadriceps autograft; Athletes; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; FEMORAL FIXATION; SPECIAL EMPHASIS; MUSCLE STRENGTH; BONE AUTOGRAFT; GRAFT; OUTCOMES; ALLOGRAFT; HARVEST; TEARS;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-020-03508-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The use of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTB) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining momentum. Yet, long-term results that compare this procedure with established methods are lacking. The aim of this study was to report and compare long-term results of ACL reconstruction using QTB autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts, both anchored using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique. Materials and methods 60 athletes (Tegner score >= 6) with primary ACL rupture were prospectively randomized into two groups. 56 patients were evaluated after a mean duration of 12.2 +/- 1.9 months (range 10-14) and 43 patients after 10.3 +/- 0.2 years (range 10-11). Results On final follow-up, 90% of patients scored very good and good results in the functional Lysholm score (mean 99 +/- 7.1, range 74-100 points). Normal or almost normal IKDC score was reported by 84% of the patients (mean 97 +/- 9.5, range 60-100 points). The activity level decreased in the Tegner score from median of 7 before injury to 6 after 10 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer showed a difference in the anterior translation of less than 3 mm (mean 1.0 +/- 1.2, range - 1 to 5 mm) in 91% of the patients. Significant degeneration was radiologically detected in one patient per group. No tunnel widening was seen in any patient. Up to 97% of all patients were satisfied with the operative procedure. No significant differences were found in the mentioned parameters between the two groups and also in comparison with the 1-year results. The only significant difference was in the donor site morbidity. Significantly more patients in the BPTB group had complaints during kneeling both at 1 (p < 0.001) and 10 years (p = 0.019). Squatting was also subjectively more problematic in the BPTB group than in the QTB group both after 1 (p = 0.003) and 10 years (p = 0.046). Conclusions This study shows equally good functional, clinical and radiological long-term results for both hardware-free methods of ACL reconstruction. These results clinically confirm the safety of press-fit anchoring after 10 years. The failure rate in this study was very low, with only one re-rupture in 10 years. The increased donor site morbidity when using the BPTB autograft compared to the QTB autograft supports already reported data. It was also seen in this study for the implant-free press-fit techniques. Study design Prospective and randomized, level of evidence 2.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1474
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Press-fit fixation in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament, using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft [J].
Al-Husseiny, M ;
Batterjee, K .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2004, 12 (02) :104-109
[2]   The biomechanical strength of a hardware-free femoral press-fit method for ACL bone-tendon-bone graft fixation [J].
Arnold, M. P. ;
Burger, L. D. ;
Wirz, D. ;
Goepfert, B. ;
Hirschmann, M. T. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (04) :1234-1240
[3]   Long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a press-fit quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft [J].
Barie, Alexander ;
Koepf, Michael ;
Jaber, Ayham ;
Moradi, Babak ;
Schmitt, Holger ;
Huber, Juergen ;
Streich, Nikolaus Alexander .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
[4]  
Barié A, 2013, TECH ORTHOP, V28, P145
[5]   Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon graft in press-fit technique: Surgical technique and follow-up [J].
Boszotta, H .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1997, 13 (03) :332-339
[6]   Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty - A comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments [J].
Bullens, PHJ ;
van Loon, CJM ;
Malefijt, MCD ;
Laan, RFJM ;
Veth, RPH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (06) :740-747
[7]   Does synovialization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a positive effect on functional performance, outcomes scores, stability and muscle strength? A 2-year follow-up study after reconstruction [J].
Chung, Kyu Sung ;
Ha, Jeong Ku ;
Ra, Ho Jong ;
Kim, Sang Bum ;
Lee, Gu Hyun ;
Kim, Jin Goo .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (12) :1725-1733
[8]   The "Ligamentization" Process in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction What Happens to the Human Graft? A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Claes, Steven ;
Verdonk, Peter ;
Forsyth, Ramses ;
Bellemans, Johan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (11) :2476-2483
[9]   Biomechanical testing of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone grafts:: an alternative graft source for press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? [J].
Dargel, J ;
Schmidt-Wiethoff, R ;
Schneider, T ;
Brüggemann, GP ;
Koebke, J .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2006, 126 (04) :265-270
[10]   BONE TUNNEL ENLARGEMENT ON ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION [J].
de Aguiar Leonardi, Adriano Barros ;
Duarte Junior, Aires ;
Severino, Nilson Roberto .
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2014, 22 (05) :240-244