Inorganic Nitrogen Retention by Watersheds at Fernow Experimental Forest and Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory

被引:15
作者
Adams, Mary Beth [1 ]
Knoepp, Jennifer D. [2 ]
Webster, Jackson R. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, No Res Stn, Timber & Watershed Lab, Parsons, WV 26287 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Southern Res Stn, Coweeta Hydrol Lab, Otto, NC 28763 USA
[3] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
UNITED-STATES; HARDWOOD FOREST; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; NITRATE; SATURATION; DEPOSITION; IMPACTS; RELEASE; BUDGETS;
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2013.11.0463nafsc
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Because elevated N loading can impair both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, understanding the abiotic and biotic controls over retention and export of dissolved inorganic N (DI N) is crucial. Long-term research has been conducted on experimental watersheds at two U.S. Forest Service experimental forests in the Appalachian region: Fernow Experimental Forest (FEF) in West Virginia and Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory (CHL) in North Carolina. While similar in vegetation and research history, FEF and CHL differ in climate, historic DI N deposition, and soils. We evaluated long-term patterns of DI N inputs and exports from three watersheds at each location with similar treatments including clear-cut harvest, conversion to conifer plantation (Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.] at FEF and white pine [Pinus strobus L.] at CHL), as well as reference watersheds. We examined DI N export and retention in these watersheds, comparing treated and reference watersheds within each experimental forest and comparing similarly treated watersheds between the experimental forests. Despite current similar levels of N deposition, stream water DI N concentrations and exports were generally greater at FEF by almost an order of magnitude. We found differences between FEF and CHL in stream DI N concentrations, watershed export, and retention of DI N inputs not only in the untreated reference watersheds but also in the watersheds with similar disturbance treatment. We hypothesize that these differences are the result of site and vegetation differences as well as site history including long-term patterns of DI N deposition. We document the switch from biogeochemical to hydrologic controls that occurred when N availability exceeded N immobilization, due to either N deposition or biological N inputs.
引用
收藏
页码:S84 / S94
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   NITROGEN SATURATION IN NORTHERN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS [J].
ABER, JD ;
NADELHOFFER, KJ ;
STEUDLER, P ;
MELILLO, JM .
BIOSCIENCE, 1989, 39 (06) :378-386
[2]  
Aber JD, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P375, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0375:INDATN]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Adams M. B., 2007, General Technical Report - Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, P97
[5]  
Adams M.B., 2006, The Fernow watershed acidification study
[6]  
Adams M.B., 1994, NE184 US FOR SERV NE
[7]  
Adams M.B., 2003, P 1 INT C RES WAT BE, P391
[8]  
Adams M.B., 2014, Long-term response of a forest watershed ecosystem. Clearcutting in the southern Appalachian, P194
[9]  
[Anonymous], PROCEDURES CHEM ANAL
[10]   Trends in stream nitrogen concentrations for forested reference catchments across the USA [J].
Argerich, A. ;
Johnson, S. L. ;
Sebestyen, S. D. ;
Rhoades, C. C. ;
Greathouse, E. ;
Knoepp, J. D. ;
Adams, M. B. ;
Likens, G. E. ;
Campbell, J. L. ;
McDowell, W. H. ;
Scatena, F. N. ;
Ice, G. G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01)