Assessing the value of reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization testing in the diagnosis of bladder cancer when routine urine cytological examination is equivocal

被引:27
作者
Kipp, Benjamin R. [1 ]
Halling, Kevin C. [1 ]
Campion, Michael B. [1 ]
Wendel, Amy J. [1 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Sebo, Thomas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
bladder; carcinoma; urothelium; hybridization; fluorescence in situ; cytology;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.082
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the usefulness of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the treatment of patients with equivocal cytology. Materials and Methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in residual urine from 124 patients with a cytological diagnosis of cell clusters (22), atypical findings (46) and suspicious findings (56) who had a same day cystoscopy result and bladder biopsy within 6 months of the cytology diagnosis. Urologists and fluorescence in situ hybridization technologists were blinded to the matching fluorescence in situ hybridization and cystoscopy results, respectively. Results: In conjunction with cystoscopy fluorescence in situ hybridization was significantly more sensitive than cystoscopy alone for detecting cancer (87% vs 67%, p<0.001) and muscle invasive cancer (94% vs 56%, p=0.031). Of the 124 equivocal cytology specimens 58 (47%) were positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of these patients 53 (91%) had subsequent evidence of carcinoma, including Ta tumors in 17, Tis in 13, T1 in 8 and T2 or greater in 15, on the first followup biopsy. Three of the 5 remaining patients with a positive fluorescence in situ hybridization result and negative first followup biopsy had evidence of cancer at a later date, including TxN+ disease in 2 and Tis in 1. A total of 66 specimens were diagnosed as negative by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of these patients 34 (52%) had negative biopsy results, whereas the remaining 32 (48%) demonstrated bladder cancer, including Ta disease in 20, Tis in 8, T1 in 2 and T2+ in 2. Cystoscopy detected 21 of the 32 tumors (66%) not detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, while fluorescence in situ hybridization detected 17 of the 28 (61%) not detected by cystoscopy. Conclusions: Our data suggest that fluorescence in situ hybridization with cystoscopy can aid clinicians in the diagnosis of bladder cancer in patients with equivocal cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1301
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bubendorf L, 2001, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V116, P79
  • [2] An international telecytologic quiz on urinary cytology reveals educational deficits and absence of a commonly used classification system
    Glatz, Katharina
    Willi, Niels
    Glatz, Dieter
    Barascud, Audrey
    Grilli, Bruno
    Herzog, Michelle
    Dalquen, Peter
    Feichter, Georg
    Gasser, Thomas C.
    Sulser, Tullio
    Bubendorf, Lukas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 126 (02) : 294 - 301
  • [3] A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and vysis urovysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine
    Halling, KC
    King, W
    Sokolova, IA
    Karnes, RJ
    Meyer, RG
    Powell, EL
    Sebo, TJ
    Cheville, JC
    Clayton, AC
    Krajnik, KL
    Ebert, TA
    Nelson, RE
    Burkhardt, HM
    Ramakumar, S
    Stewart, CS
    Pankratz, VS
    Lieber, MM
    Blute, ML
    Zincke, H
    Seelig, SA
    Jenkins, RB
    O'Kane, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) : 2001 - 2006
  • [4] An evaluation of ThinPrep UroCyte filters for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Campion, Michael B.
    Coffman, Erin
    Smith, Arthur
    Tomisek, John D.
    Browne, Gerry G.
    Panella, Jeffrey R.
    Desai, Rutuja
    Harwood, Aaron R.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 34 (07) : 479 - 484
  • [5] Kipp BR, 2005, ANAL QUANT CYTOL, V27, P317
  • [6] Molecular markers in bladder cancer: A critical appraisal
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 24 (04) : 326 - 337
  • [7] Suspicious urinary cytology with negative evaluation for malignancy in the diagnostic investigation of haematuria: how to follow up?
    Nabi, G
    Greene, D
    Donnel, MO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (04) : 365 - 368
  • [8] Urine cytology discrepancies - Frequency, causes, and outcomes
    Raab, Stephen S.
    Grzybicki, Dana Marie
    Vrbin, Colleen M.
    Geisinger, Kim R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 127 (06) : 946 - 953
  • [9] Richter J, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P2860
  • [10] Use of a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to diagnose bladder cancer in patients with hematuria
    Sarosdy, MF
    Kahn, PR
    Ziffer, MD
    Love, WR
    Barkin, J
    Abara, EO
    Jansz, K
    Bridge, JA
    Johansson, SL
    Persons, DL
    Gibson, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) : 44 - 47