Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome - a single center experience

被引:8
作者
Aviram, Amir [1 ]
Weiser, Itay [2 ]
Ashwal, Eran [1 ]
Bar, Jonathan [1 ]
Wiznitzer, Arnon [1 ]
Yogev, Yariv [1 ]
机构
[1] Helen Schneider Hosp Women, Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, Dept Reconstruct Surg, Zerifin, Israel
关键词
Cesarean delivery; combined delivery; second twin; twins; 2ND TWIN; BIRTH; SECTION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2014.927430
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to characterize risk factors for combined twin delivery and assess neonatal outcome. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women admitted for trial of labor (TOL) with twin gestation, in a single, tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. Eligibility was limited to gestations with twin A delivered vaginally. Results: During the study period, 44 263 women delivered in our center, of whom 1307 (2.9%) delivered twins. Overall, 221 out of 247 women (89.5%) undergoing TOL delivered twin A vaginally. Parturients who delivered twin B by cesarean delivery (n = 23) were compared with those delivered twin B vaginally (n = 198). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that risk factors combined delivery were included non-cephalic twin B at admission (aOR 11.5, 95% CI 3.8-34.9, p<0.001) or after delivery of twin A (aOR 17.7, 95% CI 6.6-47.2, p<0.001), and dichorionic-diamniotic (DCDA) twins (aOR 8.9, 95% CI 1.8-44.0, p = 0.008). Spontaneous version of a cephalic twin B was not found to increase the risk (above the baseline risk of non-cephalic twin B) for combined delivery. Combined delivery was associated with slightly higher risk for hemorrhagic-ischemic encephalopathy of twin B (4.3% versus 0%, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Non-cephalic twin B at admission or following delivery of twin A poses higher risk for combined delivery. Neonatal outcome of twin B following combined delivery are comparable with those of vaginal delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 514
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Cesarean delivery for the second twin [J].
Alexander, James M. ;
Leveno, Kenneth J. ;
Rouse, Dwight ;
Landon, Mark B. ;
Gilbert, Sharon A. ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Varner, Michael W. ;
Caritis, Steve N. ;
Harper, Margaret ;
Wapner, Ronald J. ;
Sorokin, Yoram ;
Miodovnik, Menachem ;
O'Sullivan, Mary J. ;
Sibai, Baha M. ;
Langer, Oded ;
Gabbe, Steven G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (04) :748-752
[2]   A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy [J].
Barrett, Jon F. R. ;
Hannah, Mary E. ;
Hutton, Eileen K. ;
Willan, Andrew R. ;
Allen, Alexander C. ;
Armson, B. Anthony ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Joseph, K. S. ;
Mason, Dalah ;
Ohlsson, Arne ;
Ross, Susan ;
Sanchez, J. Johanna ;
Asztalos, Elizabeth V. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (14) :1295-1305
[3]  
BIDER D, 1995, J REPROD MED, V40, P131
[4]  
Breathnach FM, 2011, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V205
[5]   The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) [J].
Brown, MA ;
Lindheimer, MD ;
de Swiet, M ;
Van Assche, A ;
Moutquin, JM .
HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2001, 20 (01) :IX-XIV
[6]   CRITERIA FOR SCREENING-TESTS FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES [J].
CARPENTER, MW ;
COUSTAN, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (07) :768-773
[7]  
Dollberg S, 2005, ISRAEL MED ASSOC J, V7, P311
[8]   Delivery of the second twin [J].
Ginsberg, NA ;
Levine, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (03) :217-220
[9]   Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2010-2011 [J].
Hamilton, Brady E. ;
Hoyert, Donna L. ;
Martin, Joyce A. ;
Strobino, Donna M. ;
Guyer, Bernard .
PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (03) :548-558
[10]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383