Interpretive Differences Between Patients and Radiologists Regarding the Diagnostic Confidence Associated With Commonly Used Phrases in the Radiology Report

被引:18
作者
Mityul, Marina I. [1 ]
Gilcrease-Garcia, Brian [1 ]
Searleman, Adam [2 ]
Demertzis, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Gunn, Andrew J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med St Louis, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Radiol, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249 USA
关键词
patient-centered care; practice improvement; radiology reporting; report terminology; REFERRING PHYSICIANS; STRUCTURED FEEDBACK; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; TERMINOLOGY; CERTAINTY; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18448
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Despite patients' increasing interest in reading their own imaging results, little is known about how patients interpret the reporting terminology of radiologists. The purpose of this study was to survey patients and radiologists to improve understanding of how each group views commonly used phrases within the radiology report. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients and radiologists were asked to assign a numerical likelihood of the presence of metastatic disease based on their understanding of radiology report phrasing. Commonly used qualifying phrases, such as "likely represents," "concerning for," and "cannot exclude" were evaluated to compare differences in interpretation between patients and radiologists. Potential responses for statistical likelihoods included 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-99%, and 100%. RESULTS. There was a significant difference between the two groups with respect to assigned statistical likelihoods for most phrases. Patients identified the phrase " probably metastatic disease" as conferring the highest likelihood of true malignancy, even though radiologists rated this phrase as conferring the sixth highest likelihood (p = 0.002). Radiologists consistently identified the phrase " diagnostic for metastatic disease" as conveying the highest likelihood of metastatic disease, whereas patients ranked this phrase as having the third highest numerical likelihood (p < 0.001). The phrase " cannot exclude cancer" was assigned the lowest numerical likelihood by both groups. CONCLUSION. Patients and radiologists have differing perceptions of the specific semantic meaning of the language in radiology reports. A variable interpretation of the radiologist's diagnostic confidence may lead to confusion and dissatisfaction with the report. Radiologists should consider that patients read their reports and should endeavor to use strategies to convey imaging results clearly and effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 126
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, REP DAT SYST RADS
  • [2] American College of Radiology website, 2014, ACR PRACT PAR COMM D
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, GUIDANCE NOTE LEAD A
  • [4] Burnside Elizabeth S, 2009, J Am Coll Radiol, V6, P851, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.023
  • [5] Dragojevic M., 2015, The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, P1
  • [6] Structured Feedback From Patients on Actual Radiology Reports: A Novel Approach to Improve Reporting Practices
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Gilcrease-Garcia, Brian
    Mangano, Mark D.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    Boland, Giles W.
    Choy, Garry
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (06) : 1262 - 1270
  • [7] Differing Interpretations of Report Terminology Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiologists
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Tuttle, Mitch C.
    Flores, Efren J.
    Mangano, Mark D.
    Bennett, Susan E.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    Choy, Garry
    Boland, Giles W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (12) : 1525 - 1529
  • [8] Rethinking the Role of the Radiologist: Enhancing Visibility through Both Traditional and Nontraditional Reporting Practices
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Mangano, Mark D.
    Choy, Garry
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (02) : 416 - 423
  • [9] Structured Feedback From Referring Physicians: A Novel Approach to Quality Improvement in Radiology Reporting
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Alabre, Claude I.
    Bennett, Susan E.
    Kautzky, Mira
    Krakower, Thalia
    Palamara, Kerri
    Choy, Garry
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : 853 - 857
  • [10] Recent Measures to Improve Radiology Reporting: Perspectives From Primary Care Physicians
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    Bennett, Susan E.
    Choy, Garry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (02) : 122 - 127