Native plant abundance, diversity, and richness increases in prairie restoration with field inoculation density of native mycorrhizal amendments

被引:25
作者
Koziol, Liz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crews, Timothy E. [3 ]
Bever, James D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Kansas Biol Survey, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
[3] Land Inst, Salina, KS 67041 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; inoculation density; plant microbiome; prairie restoration; GRASSLAND RESTORATION; FUNGI; SOIL; GROWTH; COLONIZATION; DISTURBANCE; RESISTANCE; BENEFITS; ROOTS;
D O I
10.1111/rec.13151
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration efforts can increase the diversity and function of degraded areas. However, current restoration practices cannot typically reestablish the full diversity and species composition of remnant plant communities. Restoration quality can be improved by reintroducing key organisms from the native plant microbiome. In particular, root symbionts called arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are critical in shaping grassland communities, but are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance, which may pose a problem for grassland restoration. Studies of mycorrhizal amendments include inoculation densities of 2-10,000 kg of inocula per hectare. These studies report variable results that may depend on inocula volume, composition, or nativeness. Here we test eight different densities of native AM fungal amendment, ranging from 0 to 8,192 kg/ha in a newly installed prairie restoration. We found that native plant establishment benefited from native mycorrhizal inocula, resulting in improvements in native plant abundance, richness, and community diversity. Moreover, the application of very low densities of native mycorrhizal inocula, as suggested on commercial mycorrhizal products, were ineffective, and higher concentrations were required to benefit native plant abundance and community diversity. These data suggest that higher densities of mycorrhizal amendment or perhaps alternative distribution methods may be required to maximize benefits of native mycorrhizal amendments in restoration practices.
引用
收藏
页码:S373 / S380
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi applications on maize production and soil phosphorus availability [J].
Cozzolino, Vincenza ;
Di Meo, Vincenzo ;
Piccolo, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2013, 129 :40-44
[12]   DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF MYCORRHIZAL PEPPER PLANTS INDEPENDENT OF LEAF P-CONCENTRATION - RESPONSE IN GAS-EXCHANGE AND WATER RELATIONS [J].
DAVIES, FT ;
POTTER, JR ;
LINDERMAN, RG .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1993, 87 (01) :45-53
[13]  
Debinski Diane M., 1997, Prairie Naturalist, V29, P219
[14]   Non-native plants and soil microbes: potential contributors to the consistent reduction in soil aggregate stability caused by the disturbance of North American grasslands [J].
Duchicela, Jessica ;
Vogelsang, Keith M. ;
Schultz, Peggy A. ;
Kaonongbua, Wittaya ;
Middleton, Elizabeth L. ;
Bever, James D. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2012, 196 (01) :212-222
[15]   Local soil, but not commercial AMF inoculum, increases native and non-native grass growth at a mine restoration site [J].
Emam, Taraneh .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2016, 24 (01) :35-44
[16]   Disturbance reduces the differentiation of mycorrhizal fungal communities in grasslands along a precipitation gradient [J].
House, Geoffrey L. ;
Bever, James D. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (03) :736-748
[17]  
HOUSE GL, 2019, RESTORATION ECOLOGY
[18]   THE EFFECT OF SOIL DISTURBANCE ON VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN SOILS FROM DIFFERENT VEGETATION TYPES [J].
JASPER, DA ;
ABBOTT, LK ;
ROBSON, AD .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1991, 118 (03) :471-476
[19]   Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses [J].
Johnson, Nancy Collins ;
Wilson, Gail W. T. ;
Bowker, Matthew A. ;
Wilson, Jacqueline A. ;
Miller, R. Michael .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (05) :2093-2098
[20]  
Kindscher K, 1998, RESTOR ECOL, V6, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1998.06210.x