Detection of chromosomal aberrations in prostate cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

被引:6
作者
Celep, F [1 ]
Karagüzel, A
Özgür, GK
Yildiz, K
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Biol & Genet, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
prostatic carcinoma; tissue culture; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH);
D O I
10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00414-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool for quantitative analysis of chromosomes and genes and can be applied in a variety of specimens, including cell cultures, isolated nuclei from fresh and fixed tissues, and histological tissue sections. For detection of numerical chromosome aberrations, we examined prostatic cancer samples at our department. In addition, we also observed primary and secondary aberrations taking part in the initiation and progression of tumours. Materials and Methods: FISH using chromosome-specific a-satellite DNA probes for chromosomes 7, 8, 9, 10, 17, X and Y was performed on 19 prostatic cancer and 19 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) samples obtained from transurethral resection (TUR) and archival paraffin-embedded blocks. Results: Numerical aberrations were observed in 41% of the tumours studied. A range of aberrant copy numbers of chromosome 9 (68%), 7 (63%), 8 (58%), 17 (37%), Y (32%) and 10 (26%) was observed. We did not observe significant aberrations in BPH samples. In prostate cancer patients, chromosomes 7 (47%), 8 (58%) and 9 (63%) were monosomic by FISH. Monosomy 8 and 9 were significant differences (p>0.05) between prostate cancer and BPH patients. Conclusions: FISH analysis could be observed an one of strongest methods of analysis in detecting numerical aberrations of individual chromosomes with application to paraffin-block samples, metaphase and, interphase nuclei. To our knowledge, this analysis is firstly studied in Turkish patients. Therefore, results of this analysis may be important for Turkish patients. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 671
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   CYTOGENETIC SURVEY OF 32 CANCERS OF THE PROSTATE [J].
ARPS, S ;
RODEWALD, A ;
SCHMALENBERGER, B ;
CARL, P ;
BRESSEL, M ;
KASTENDIECK, H .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1993, 66 (02) :93-99
[2]   TRISOMY-7 - A POTENTIAL CYTOGENETIC MARKER OF HUMAN PROSTATE-CANCER PROGRESSION [J].
BANDYK, MG ;
ZHAO, L ;
TRONCOSO, P ;
PISTERS, LL ;
PALMER, JL ;
VONESCHENBACH, AC ;
CHUNG, LWK ;
LIANG, JC .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 1994, 9 (01) :19-27
[3]  
BONTRON D, 1998, CLIN GENETICS CASE B, P34
[4]  
BREITKREUZ T, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P4035
[5]   EVALUATION OF 20 ARCHIVAL PROSTATE TUMOR SPECIMENS BY FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) [J].
BROTHMAN, AR ;
WATSON, MJ ;
ZHU, XL ;
WILLIAMS, BJ ;
ROHR, LR .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1994, 75 (01) :40-44
[6]  
Brothman AR, 1999, PROSTATE, V38, P303
[7]   CHROMOSOMAL ANEUSOMIES DETECTED BY FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION ANALYSIS IN CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
BROWN, JA ;
ALCARAZ, A ;
TAKAHASHI, S ;
PERSONS, DL ;
LIEBER, MM ;
JENKINS, RB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (04) :1157-1162
[8]   MAPPING OF REGIONS OF PHYSICAL DELETION ON CHROMOSOME 16Q IN PROSTATE-CANCER CELLS BY FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) [J].
CHER, ML ;
ITO, T ;
WEIDNER, N ;
CARROLL, PR ;
JENSEN, RH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (01) :249-254
[9]   Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization [J].
Forozan, F ;
Karhu, R ;
Kononen, J ;
Kallioniemi, A ;
Kallioniemi, OP .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1997, 13 (10) :405-409
[10]  
GLEASON DF, 1974, UROLOGIC PATHOLOGY P, P171