Evaluating the feasibility of a decision aid to promote shared decision making among young adults with first-episode psychosis: protocol for a pilot study

被引:11
作者
Zisman-Ilani, Yaara [1 ]
Hurford, Irene [2 ,3 ]
Bowen, Andrea [2 ]
Salzer, Mark [1 ]
Thomas, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Psychosis Educ Assessment Care & Empowerment PEAC, Horizon House, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Shared decision making; Decision aid; Psychosis; First Episode Psychosis; Schizophrenia; Emerging adults; RAISE CONNECTION PROGRAM; ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATION; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT; 1ST EPISODE; HIGH-RISK; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CARE; PEOPLE; NONADHERENCE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-020-00757-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Young adults ages 18 to 25 with first episode psychosis (FEP) have an increased risk of discontinuation antipsychotic medications and psychiatric service disengagement that lead to symptom exacerbation and deterioration. We seek to (1) examine the feasibility, usability, and potential impact of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) Antipsychotic Medication Decision Aid (DA) on decision-making, adherence to the decision made, and service engagement among young adults with FEP and (2) understand the role of additional patient-level factors on SDM. Methods: A randomized controlled trial is being conducted in a coordinated specialty care community program for FEP in an urban setting. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive an intervention, the Antipsychotic Medication Decision Aid, or treatment as usual. Patients receive their assigned intervention before their medication appointment with the psychiatrist and complete four interviews: before the appointment (T0), after the appointment (T1), and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups (T2 and T3). The study staff and participating psychiatrists are not blinded to the intervention. The data are de-identified to maintain blinding during the analysis process. The primary aims are feasibility of intervention delivery and research procedures and preliminary impact of the intervention on SDM-related outcomes, medication adherence, and service engagement. As a secondary aim, we will explore the contribution of personality and motivation variables, clinical relationships, cognitive functioning, and mental-health-related stigma to SDM. If the sample size permits, we plan to conduct parametric tests such as independent-samples t tests at T1 to compare differences in SDM, adherence, and engagement scales. In the case of a small sample size, we will use non-parametric tests and descriptive statistics. Discussion: This protocol outlines the methodology for a feasibility pilot comparing the effect of a novel SDM Antipsychotic Medication encounter DA with treatment as usual on SDM, medication adherence, and service engagement in FEP care. SDM is endorsed as a framework for use in FEP and antipsychotic pharmacotherapy, but its impact on adherence and health outcomes is unclear. Understanding the potential contribution of an SDM Antipsychotic Medication DA compared with usual care in psychosis pharmacotherapy is critical. The study will help answer several key questions new to SDM research, including the contribution of personality and clinical relationships to SDM in mental health and psychosis in particular. The study will serve to gather feasibility data to inform future studies and scale-up.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [41] The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
    Leon, Andrew C.
    Davis, Lori L.
    Kraemer, Helena C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (05) : 626 - 629
  • [42] Relationship of Metacognition and Insight to Neural Synchronization and Cognitive Function in Early Phase Psychosis
    Leonhardt, Bethany L.
    Vohs, Jenifer L.
    Bartolomeo, Lisa A.
    Visco, Andrew
    Hetrick, William P.
    Bolbecker, Amanda R.
    Breier, Alan
    Lysaker, Paul H.
    O'Donnell, Brian F.
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 51 (04) : 259 - 266
  • [43] Client Views of Engagement in the RAISE Connection Program for Early Psychosis Recovery
    Lucksted, Alicia
    Essock, Susan M.
    Stevenson, Jennifer
    Mendon, Sapna J.
    Nossel, Ilana R.
    Goldman, Howard H.
    Goldstein, Amy B.
    Dixon, Lisa B.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2015, 66 (07) : 699 - 704
  • [44] Metacognitive approaches to the treatment of psychosis: a comparison of four approaches
    Lysaker, Paul H.
    Gagen, Emily
    Moritz, Steffen
    Schweitzer, Robert D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 : 341 - 351
  • [45] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE APATHY EVALUATION SCALE
    MARIN, RS
    BIEDRZYCKI, RC
    FIRINCIOGULLARI, S
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1991, 38 (02) : 143 - 162
  • [46] Decision Making in Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Care
    Matthias, Marianne S.
    Salyers, Michelle P.
    Rollins, Angela L.
    Frankel, Richard M.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2012, 35 (04) : 305 - 314
  • [47] A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes
    Montori, VM
    Gafni, A
    Charles, C
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2006, 9 (01) : 25 - 36
  • [48] Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: beyond the micro-social
    Morant, Nicola
    Kaminskiy, Emma
    Ramon, Shulamit
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) : 1002 - 1014
  • [49] Prevalence of psychotic disorders and its association with methodological issues. A systematic review and meta-analyses
    Moreno-Kustner, Berta
    Martin, Carlos
    Pastor, Loly
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [50] O'Connor A.M., 2000, User Manual - Knowledge