Age-specific clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gallbladder

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Guo, Tong [1 ]
Huang, Xiaorui [1 ]
Xie, Peng [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Yu, Yahong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Biliopancreat Surg, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
adenocarcinoma; gallbladder cancer; neuroendocrine carcinoma; overall survival rate; propensity score matching; DIAGNOSIS; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4463
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background We have limited information about neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the gallbladder. The purpose of this paper is to compare clinical and pathological features between different age groups and prognostic factors for gallbladder NEC and how it differs from adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the gallbladder. Patients and methods This study included 28 gallbladder NEC patients and 137 ADC patients whose clinical characteristics and pathological findings were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were used for the analysis of prognostic factors. Results We divided NEC patients into two groups based on the age more than or less than 60 years. Most of the NEC patients less than 60 years old complained of abdominal pain or discomfort (p = 0.038), and more younger patients accepted adjuvant therapy (p = 0.020) than older patients did. CD56 was positive in all patients more than 60 years old, which is significantly higher than that of younger patients (p = 0.039). The mean age was similar between NEC and ADC patients. After eliminating confounding factors between NEC and ADC patients, the overall survival rates were still lower in NEC patients. Univariate analysis extracted six possible risk factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that surgery type, tumor size, and existence of gallstones were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion The overall survival of gallbladder NEC is not associated with age. In this study, surgical method and tumor size were found to be independent risk factors for NECs. In addition, NEC patients have a worse prognosis than ADC patients with similar clinical and pathological features.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 653
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MET exon 14 skipping mutation in triple-negative pulmonary adenocarcinomas and pleomorphic carcinomas: An analysis of intratumoral MET status heterogeneity and clinicopathological characteristics
    Kwon, Dohee
    Koh, Jaemoon
    Kim, Sehui
    Go, Heounjeong
    Kim, Young A.
    Keam, Bhumsuk
    Kim, Tae Min
    Kim, Dong-Wan
    Jeon, Yoon Kyung
    Chung, Doo Hyun
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 106 : 131 - 137
  • [42] Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in 54 metaplastic breast carcinoma patients from northwest China
    Du, Jing
    Wu, Shuhan
    Liu, Jiayan
    Guo, Bo
    Li, Jianhui
    Li, Wenhan
    Zhang, Ying
    Song, Hengtao
    Shu, Wenjun
    Li, Zhenzhen
    Zhu, Xulong
    CYTOJOURNAL, 2024, 21
  • [43] Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of POLE mutations in endometrial cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Ya
    Wang, Tian
    Li, Na
    Yang, Binkai
    Hu, Yuanjing
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (08)
  • [44] Retrospective analysis of schwannoma in the oral and maxillofacial region: clinicopathological characteristics and specific pathology of ancient change
    Harazono, Yosuke
    Kayamori, Kou
    Sakamoto, Junichiro
    Akaike, Yu
    Kurasawa, Yasuhiro
    Tsushima, Fumihiko
    Sasaki, Yoshiyuki
    Harada, Hiroyuki
    Yoda, Tetsuya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (03): : 326 - 331
  • [45] Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Consecutive Analysis Based on Previous Study Results
    Luo, Xinmei
    Yang, Min
    Tian, Bole
    Liu, Xubao
    Duan, Kaiti
    Zhang, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [46] Clinical Features and Outcomes of Invasive Breast Cancer: Age-Specific Analysis of a Modern Hospital-Based Registry
    Kim, Ji-Yeon
    Kang, Danbee
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Kim, Seok Won
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    Yu, Jong Han
    Lee, Se Kyung
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Guallar, Eliseo
    Cho, Juhee
    Park, Yeon Hee
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 : 1 - 9
  • [47] Prognostic Evaluations Tailored to Specific Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Analysis Of 200 Cases with Extended Follow-Up
    Vanoli, Alessandro
    La Rosa, Stefano
    Miceli, Emanuela
    Klersy, Catherine
    Maragliano, Roberta
    Capuano, Francesca
    Persichella, Andrea
    Martino, Michele
    Inzani, Frediano
    Luinetti, Ombretta
    Di Sabatino, Antonio
    Sessa, Fausto
    Paulli, Marco
    Corazza, Gino Roberto
    Rindi, Guido
    Bordi, Cesare
    Capella, Carlo
    Solcia, Enrico
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 107 (02) : 114 - 126
  • [48] Retrospective Analysis of Clinicopathological Characteristics of Surgically Treated Basal Cell Carcinomas of the Face: A Single-Centre Maxillofacial Surgery Experience
    Saeidi, Abdullah
    Guelses, Aydin
    Jamil, Maryam
    Alolayan, Albraa
    Elsayed, Shadia
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Floerke, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [49] Single-center analysis of biopsy-confirmed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: incidence, clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors
    Dierickx, Daan
    Tousseyn, Thomas
    Sagaert, Xavier
    Fieuws, Steffen
    Wlodarska, Iwona
    Morscio, Julie
    Brepoels, Lieselot
    Kuypers, Dirk
    Vanhaecke, Johan
    Nevens, Frederik
    Verleden, Geert
    Van Damme-Lombaerts, Rita
    Renard, Marleen
    Pirenne, Jacques
    De Wolf-Peeters, Christiane
    Verhoef, Gregor
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2013, 54 (11) : 2433 - 2440
  • [50] Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and survival outcomes according to age at diagnosis: A population-based analysis
    Wu, San-Gang
    Liao, Xu-Lin
    He, Zhen-Yu
    Tang, Li-Ying
    Chen, Xue-Ting
    Wang, Yan
    Lin, Qin
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 73 : 83 - 87