Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes

被引:46
作者
Fischer, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Maggetti, Martino [3 ]
机构
[1] Eawag, Dept Environm Social Sci, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Polit Sci, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Inst Polit Hist & Int Studies, Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS | 2017年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
Qualitative Comparative Analysis; public policy; policy process; multiple configurational causality; temporality; COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS QCA; RELIGIOUS MINORITIES; DIRECT DEMOCRACY; WELFARE-STATE; SET; CONFIGURATIONS; TEMPORALITY; COMPLEXITY; POLITICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Given the increasing popularity of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) for the study of public policy and policy processes, this article offers a review of two key issues: multiple configurational causality and temporality. On the one hand, the study of multiple configurational causal relations allows researchers to deal with the extremely complex set of elements that interact in policy processes. However, this task poses the challenge of balancing deductive and inductive logics in a research design. On the other hand, policy process theories often involve temporal arguments, but QCA does not easily deal with dynamic elements. This article discusses these challenges and proposes several ways to address them. It thereby illustrates the advantages and limitations of QCA for students of policy processes.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 361
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[41]  
Knoepfel P., 2007, PUBLIC POLICY ANAL
[42]   Fuzzy Sets on Shaky Ground: Parameter Sensitivity and Confirmation Bias in fsQCA [J].
Krogslund, Chris ;
Choi, Donghyun Danny ;
Poertner, Mathias .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 23 (01) :21-41
[43]  
Lasswell H.D., 1951, The policy orientation The Policy Sciences, P13
[44]   Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research [J].
Lieberman, ES .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (03) :435-452
[45]   COMPARATIVE POLITICS AND COMPARATIVE METHOD [J].
LIJPHART, A .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1971, 65 (03) :682-&
[46]  
Lijphart Arend., 2012, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries
[47]   Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games [J].
Lubell, Mark ;
Henry, Adam Douglas ;
McCoy, Mike .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (02) :287-300
[48]   QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
Lucas, Samuel R. ;
Szatrowski, Alisa .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2014, VOL 44, 2014, 44 :1-79
[49]   De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy-set analysis [J].
Maggetti, Martino .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2007, 1 (04) :271-294
[50]   Dealing with Errors in QCA [J].
Maggetti, Martino ;
Levi-Faur, David .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2013, 66 (01) :198-204