Medicaid Waiver Adoption for Youth With Complex Behavioral Health Care Needs: An Analysis of State Decision-Making

被引:12
作者
Graaf, Genevieve [1 ]
Snowden, Lonnie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD); families; Medicare; Medicaid; long-term care; mental health; politics; SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE; NATIONAL PROFILE; MENTAL-DISORDERS; CHILDREN; HOME; SERVICE; EXPENDITURES;
D O I
10.1177/1044207319897058
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Many states have enacted Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid waivers, which waive or expand Medicaid means tests to increase access to community-based public mental health services for youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED). This study sought to understand key factors in State Mental Health Authorities and Medicaid Agency decision-making in adopting Medicaid waivers for youth with SED. Using purposive sampling to collect data through semi-structured interviews with officials from 37 state mental health systems, interviews focused on fiscal, historical, and political reasons for states' adoption or rejection of Medicaid waivers to serve youth with SED. Results suggest that decisions around waiver adoption relate to the size and flexibility of state budgets, the sufficiency of existing public HCBS funding and services, political prioritization of children and families, states' desire to move away from a reliance on residential care, and ideology related to the role of the state in providing for the welfare of children and families. Advocacy efforts promoting state waiver adoption can address apprehensions about budget constraints and providing financial assistance to non-poor families by emphasizing potential cost savings from residential diversion and ethical imperatives to keep children in their homes and communities.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 98
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Mental Health Parity Legislation: Implications for Children and Youth With Serious Emotional Disturbance [J].
Bailey, Bridget C. ;
Davis, Tamara S. .
SOCIAL WORK IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2012, 10 (01) :12-33
[2]  
Barry CL, 2008, J MENT HEALTH POLICY, V11, P57
[3]   Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: A comparison using propensity scores [J].
Barth, Richard P. ;
Greeson, Johanna K. P. ;
Guo, Shenyang ;
Green, Rebecca L. ;
Hurley, Sarah ;
Sisson, Jocelyn .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2007, 77 (04) :497-505
[4]   Interest Group Conflict Over Medicaid Expansion: The Surprising Impact of Public Advocates [J].
Callaghan, Timothy ;
Jacobs, Lawrence R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (02) :308-313
[5]   When interventions harm -: Peer groups and problem behavior [J].
Dishion, TJ ;
McCord, J ;
Poulin, F .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (09) :755-764
[6]   Research in the service of policy change: The "custody problem" [J].
Friesen, BJ ;
Giliberti, M ;
Katz-Leavy, J ;
Osher, T ;
Pullmann, MD .
JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2003, 11 (01) :39-47
[7]   Patterns of Multisystem Service Use and School Dropout Among Seventh-, Eighth-, and Ninth-Grade Students [J].
Garcia, Antonio R. ;
Metraux, Stephen ;
Chen, Chin-Chih ;
Park, Jung Min ;
Culhane, Dennis P. ;
Furstenberg, Frank F. .
JOURNAL OF EARLY ADOLESCENCE, 2018, 38 (08) :1041-1073
[8]   Medicaid Waivers and Public Sector Mental Health Service Penetration Rates for Youth [J].
Graaf, Genevieve ;
Snowden, Lonnie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2018, 88 (05) :597-607
[9]   The role of Medicaid home and community-based service policies in organizing and financing care for children with severe emotional disturbance [J].
Graaf, Genevieve ;
Snowden, Lonnie .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2017, 81 :272-283
[10]   POLITICAL-ECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING STATE MEDICAID POLICY [J].
GROGAN, CM .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1994, 47 (03) :589-622