A new prognostic model to predict dropout from the waiting list in cirrhotic candidates for liver transplantation with MELD score <18

被引:15
作者
Biselli, Maurizio [1 ]
Dall'Agata, Marco [1 ]
Gramenzi, Annagiulia [1 ]
Gitto, Stefano [2 ]
Liberati, Caterina [3 ]
Brodosi, Lucia [1 ]
Ravaioli, Matteo [1 ]
Gambato, Martina [4 ]
Montalti, Roberto [5 ]
Pinna, Antonio D. [1 ]
Burra, Patrizia [4 ]
Gerunda, Giorgio E. [5 ]
Cillo, Umberto [4 ]
Andreone, Pietro [1 ]
Bernardi, Mauro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Sci Med & Chirurg, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Univ Modena, Dipartimento Med Interna, Unita Gastroenterol, Modena, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Econ, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Sci Chirurg Oncol & Gastroenterol, Padua, Italy
[5] Azienda Osped Univ Modena, Dipartimento Chirurg Gen & Special Chirurg, Unita Operat Chirurg Trapianti, Modena, Italy
关键词
competing risk; liver transplantation; organ allocation; prognosis; scoring system; survival analysis; wait list; SERUM CREATININE; COMPETING RISKS; RENAL-FUNCTION; SURVIVAL; DISEASE; ALLOCATION; PELD;
D O I
10.1111/liv.12538
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & AimsThe model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is used for organ allocation in liver transplantation (LT), but its prognostic performance is less accurate in patients with low score. We assess the outcome of patients with MELD<18 awaiting LT, finding prognostic variables to identify a high dropout risk. MethodsTraining set consisted of 277 patients and validation cohort of 292 patients. Competing risk regression analysis, taking into account LT, was used for univariate/multivariate analysis. ResultsAscites, sodium, bilirubin, albumin and glomerular filtration rate were independently associated with a 12-month dropout risk in the training set. Combining these five prognostic parameters, we calculated a new score named liver-renal-risk (LIRER). In the validation set, the 12-month LIRER concordance index showed a discrimination power [0.798, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.793-0.803] better than MELD (0.582, 95% CI 0.575-0.588), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (0.687, 95% CI 0.681-0.693), MELD-sodium (0.721, 95% CI 0.715-0.727) and MELD-ascites-sodium (0.729, 95% CI 0.724-0.735), with a remarkable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: P=0.91; R-2=0.911). Considering all study patients, the risk of wait list dropout increased with the rise in LIRER. The survival benefit analysis comparing the wait list dropout risk with the mortality of the 216 transplanted patients with same LIRER showed an important benefit for LT in patients with LIRER>15.9. ConclusionsIn patients with low MELD (<18), combination of ascites, sodium, albumin, bilirubin and renal function in a new score (LIRER) discriminates patients at high risk of medium-term adverse outcome from those in whom LT may be safely deferred.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Model for end-stage liver disease - Did the new liver allocation policy affect waiting list mortality? [J].
Austin, Mary T. ;
Poulose, Benjamin K. ;
Ray, Wayne A. ;
Arbogast, Patrick G. ;
Feurer, Irene D. ;
Pinson, Wright .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (11) :1079-1085
[2]   Liver and Intestine Transplantation in the United States 1998-2007 [J].
Berg, C. L. ;
Steffick, D. E. ;
Edwards, E. B. ;
Heimbach, J. K. ;
Magee, J. C. ;
Washburn, W. K. ;
Mazariegos, G. V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (04) :907-931
[3]   Six Score Systems to Evaluate Candidates with Advanced Cirrhosis for Orthotopic Liver Transplant: Which Is the Winner? [J].
Biselli, Maurizio ;
Gitto, Stefano ;
Gramenzi, Annagiulia ;
Di Donato, Roberto ;
Brodosi, Lucia ;
Ravaioli, Matteo ;
Grazi, Gian Luca ;
Pinna, Antonio Daniele ;
Andreone, Pietro ;
Bernardi, Mauro .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (08) :964-973
[4]   PRIORITIZATION AND ORGAN DISTRIBUTION FOR LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BRONSTHER, O ;
FUNG, JJ ;
IZAKIS, A ;
VANTHIEL, D ;
STARZL, TE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (02) :140-143
[5]   Review article: renal function assessment in cirrhosis - difficulties and alternative measurements [J].
Cholongitas, E. ;
Shusang, V. ;
Marelli, L. ;
Nair, D. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Patch, D. ;
Burns, A. ;
Sweny, P. ;
Burroughs, A. K. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 26 (07) :969-978
[6]   Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores - A systematic bias [J].
Cholongitas, E. ;
Marelli, L. ;
Kerry, A. ;
Goodier, D. W. ;
Nair, D. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Patch, D. ;
Burroughs, A. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :685-692
[7]   Candidate Selection and Organ Allocation in Liver Transplantation [J].
Dawwas, Muhammad F. ;
Gimson, Alexander E. .
SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2009, 29 (01) :40-52
[8]   Estimation of glomerular filtration rates before and after orthotopic liver transplantation: Evaluation of current equations [J].
Gonwa, T ;
Jennings, L ;
Mai, ML ;
Stark, PC ;
Levey, AS ;
Kintmalm, GB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (02) :301-309
[9]   A CLASS OF K-SAMPLE TESTS FOR COMPARING THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF A COMPETING RISK [J].
GRAY, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1988, 16 (03) :1141-1154
[10]   Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatic encephalopathy [J].
Haeussinger, D. ;
Schliess, F. .
GUT, 2008, 57 (08) :1156-1165