Probability of breech presentation and its significance

被引:17
作者
Sekulic, Slobodan R. [1 ]
Mikov, Aleksandra [2 ]
Petrovic, Dorde S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Clin Ctr Vojvodina, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Inst Children & Youth Hlth Care, Children Ctr Habilitat & Rehabil, Novi Sad, Serbia
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Ctr Vojvodina, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Breech presentation; fetus; newborn; pregnancy; delivery; FETAL PRESENTATION; PREGNANCY; DELIVERY; RECURRENCE; POSITION; RISK;
D O I
10.3109/14767051003677996
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Existing data related to the probability of breech presentation suggest that the breech presentation is a consequence of mere filling of the intrauterine space, with the same probability of breech and cephalic presentation. As a consequence, group of cephalic presenting fetuses is heterogenous. Some fetuses randomly assume the cephalic presentation while others assume cephalic presentation 'intentionally' for a reason. Before comparing breech and cephalic presenting fetuses/newborns, bias should be eliminated by subtracting from the cephalic-presenting group the number of fetuses/newborns that is identical with the number of breech-presenting fetuses/newborns with identical characteristics. The subtracted group should be added to the breech-presenting group before comparison with the remaining cephalic-presenting fetuses/newborns. The comparison should be corrected for the gestational age and according to data that are not influenced by delivery. Data suggest that the physiological process that accounts for 92% of cephalic-presenting human fetuses at delivery should be sought from the 25th gestational week onwards.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1164
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Reproductive career after breech presentation: Subsequent pregnancy rates, interpregnancy interval, and recurrence [J].
Albrechtsen, S ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Dalaker, K ;
Irgens, LM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (03) :345-350
[2]   FETAL POSITIONING IN THE 2ND-HALF OF PREGNANCY IN BIRTHS FROM BREECH AND VERTEX PRESENTATION [J].
BOOS, R ;
HENDRIK, HJ ;
SCHMIDT, W .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1987, 47 (05) :341-345
[3]   CHARACTERISTICS AND PERILS OF BREECH PRESENTATION [J].
BRENNER, WE ;
BRUCE, RD ;
HENDRICKS, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 118 (05) :700-712
[4]   REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE OF WOMEN WITH UTERINE ANOMALIES - AN EVALUATION OF 182 CASES [J].
HEINONEN, PK ;
SAARIKOSKI, S ;
PYSTYNEN, P .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 61 (02) :157-162
[5]   FETAL POSITION DURING PREGNANCY [J].
HUGHEY, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 153 (08) :885-886
[6]   BREECH PRESENTATION - IS IT A BAD OMEN [J].
HYTTEN, FE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1982, 89 (11) :879-880
[7]  
KUROIWA T, 1991, AM J NEURORADIOL, V12, P161
[8]  
Liley A W, 1986, Fetal Ther, V1, P8
[9]  
MILLER EC, 1981, ZBL GYNAKOL, V103, P105
[10]   UTERINE MALFORMATION AND FETAL DEFORMATION [J].
MILLER, ME ;
DUNN, PM ;
SMITH, DW .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1979, 94 (03) :387-390