Treatment of incomplete analgesia after placement of an epidural catheter and administration of local anesthetic for women in labor

被引:16
作者
Beilin, Y
Zahn, J
Bernstein, HH
Zucker-Pinchoff, B
Zenzen, WJ
Andres, LA
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
关键词
complications; obstetrics; pain; regional anesthesia;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199806000-00013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Approximately 15% of women still have pain after placement of an epidural catheter and administration of local anesthetic for labor analgesia, Two techniques frequently used to treat this pain were compared: (1) withdrawal of the catheter 1 cm and repeated dosing with additional local anesthetic, and (2) repeated dosing with additional local anesthetic without any catheter manipulation. Methods: Fifteen minutes after placement of a multiple-orifice epidural catheter 5 cm into the epidural space and administration of 13 ml 0.25% bupivacaine to the parturient in labor, the adequacy of analgesia was assessed. All women who had incomplete analgesia were randomized (first intervention) to receive an additional 5 mi 0.25% bupivacaine (local-anesthetic-only group) or to receive 5 mi 0.25% bupivacaine after first withdrawing the epidural catheter 1 cm (catheter-manipulation group). If after 15 min the woman still had pain, then (second intervention) the catheter was withdrawn 1 cm and an additional 5 mi 0.25% bupivacaine was administered to the local-anesthetic-only group, whereas 5 mi 0.25% bupivacaine was given to the catheter-manipulation group without further catheter manipulation. The success rate of the second intervention was assessed 15 min later. Results: Seventy-eight women mere enrolled in the study, 39 to each group. In the local-anesthetic-only group, 29 (74%) women were successfully treated with the first intervention and the remaining 10 (100%) were successfully treated with the second intervention. In the catheter-manipulation group, 30 (77%) were successfully treated with the first intervention and 7 (100%; 2 patients were not studied because of investigator error) were successfully treated with the second intervention (P = NS). Conclusions: Administration of additional local anesthetic without first withdrawing the epidural catheter will effectively treat most women for whom analgesia is incomplete after the placement of an epidural catheter during labor.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1506
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Radiographic findings of unilateral epidural block [J].
Asato, F ;
Goto, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (03) :519-522
[2]  
BEILIN Y, 1995, ANESTH ANALG, V81, P301
[3]  
Collier C B, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7
[4]   Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion [J].
DAngelo, R ;
Berkebile, BL ;
Gerancher, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (01) :88-93
[5]   A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients [J].
DAngelo, R ;
Foss, ML ;
Livesay, CH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (06) :1276-1279
[7]   ASYMMETRIC ONSET OF SYMPATHETIC BLOCKADE IN EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA SHOWS NO RELATION TO EPIDURAL CATHETER POSITION [J].
GIELEN, MJM ;
SLAPPENDEL, R ;
MERX, JL .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (01) :81-84
[8]   POSTURE AND THE SPREAD OF EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
MERRY, AF ;
CROSS, JA ;
MAYADEO, SV ;
WILD, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (04) :303-307
[9]   COMPARISON OF COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SINGLE-HOLED AND MULTI-HOLED EXTRADURAL CATHETERS [J].
MORRISON, LMM ;
BUCHAN, AS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (02) :183-185
[10]   EFFECT OF LATERAL POSITION AND VOLUME ON THE SPREAD OF EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN THE PARTURIENT [J].
ROLBIN, SH ;
COLE, AFD ;
HEW, EM ;
VIRGINT, S .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1981, 28 (05) :431-435