Thermal Artifact after Three Techniques of Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone: A Comparative Study

被引:7
作者
Boonlikit, Sathone [1 ]
Yanaranop, Marut [1 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Rajavithi Hosp,Div Gynecol Oncol, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
Thermal artifact; Electrosurgical unit; Contoured loop excision of the transformation zone; Large loop excision of the transformation zone; Radiofrequency; COLD-KNIFE CONIZATION; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONE BIOPSY; SPECIMENS; LLETZ; LASER; MARGINS; MANAGEMENT; DYSPLASIA; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1159/000333438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aims: To compare a surgical-margin thermal artifact in 3 techniques of loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ). Methods: The histopathologic specimens from 140 patients who underwent 3 techniques of LETZ with different electrosurgical units (large loop used with a Valleylab, large loop used with an Ellman Surgitron, and contoured loop with a Utah Finesse) performed in Rajavithi Hospital between January 2003 and June 2007 were reevaluated by one pathologist with regard to degree and width of diathermy artifact. Results: All of the specimens exhibited thermal tissue artifacts but there were varying degrees of extent and severity. Overall, the mean thermal artifact zone was 0.85 +/- 0.94, 0.57 +/- 0.47, and 0.49 +/- 0.51 mm for the endocervical margin, ectocervical margin, and stromal margin, respectively. However, the thermal artifact did not interfere with the histological diagnosis or the assessment of the margins in all cases. There were no statistical differences in the thermal artifact measurements in the 3 groups. The 3 LETZ techniques provided comparable thermal artifacts in terms of qualitative and quantitative measurement. Conclusions: The thermal artifacts, both in severity and extent, are not significantly different in the 3 LETZ techniques. For routine LETZ in clinical practice, those techniques can be used with a comparable outcome. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 235
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF THERMAL-INJURY ZONES IN LOOP ELECTRICAL AND LASER CERVICAL EXCISIONAL CONIZATION [J].
BAGGISH, MS ;
BARASH, F ;
NOEL, Y ;
BROOKS, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (02) :545-548
[2]   DOES THE LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF CERVICAL CONIZATION SPECIMENS [J].
CHEN, RJ ;
LEE, EF ;
SHIH, JC .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 73 (09) :726-729
[3]  
Dalrymple C, 1999, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V9, P238
[4]  
FELIX JC, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P996
[5]  
FERRIS DG, 1994, J FAM PRACTICE, V39, P160
[6]  
Fischer, 1998, Prim Care Update Ob Gyns, V5, P161, DOI 10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00056-0
[7]  
HURWITZ JJ, 1993, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V28, P28
[8]   Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: Correlation with follow-up [J].
Ioffe, OB ;
Brooks, SE ;
De Rezende, RB ;
Silverberg, SG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 18 (02) :115-121
[9]  
Janthanaphan Manop, 2009, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V92, P1573
[10]  
Kainz C, 1996, J REPROD MED, V41, P409