Comparative landscape genetics reveals differential effects of environment on host and pathogen genetic structure in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) and their transmissible tumour

被引:9
作者
Kozakiewicz, Christopher P. [1 ]
Ricci, Lauren [1 ]
Patton, Austin H. [1 ,2 ]
Stahlke, Amanda R. [3 ]
Hendricks, Sarah A. [3 ]
Margres, Mark J. [1 ,4 ]
Ruiz-Aravena, Manuel [5 ,6 ]
Hamilton, David G. [5 ]
Hamede, Rodrigo [5 ]
McCallum, Hamish [6 ]
Jones, Menna E. [5 ]
Hohenlohe, Paul A. [3 ]
Storfer, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Biol Sci, Inst Bioinformat & Evolutionary Studies, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Environm Futures Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
conservation genetics; disease biology; ecological genetics; host-parasite interactions; landscape genetics; population genetics-empirical; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INFECTIOUS-DISEASE; READ ALIGNMENT; R-PACKAGE; DIVERSITY; DECLINE; FLOW; DISPERSAL; PARASITE;
D O I
10.1111/mec.15558
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genetic structure in host species is often used to predict disease spread. However, host and pathogen genetic variation may be incongruent. Understanding landscape factors that have either concordant or divergent influence on host and pathogen genetic structure is crucial for wildlife disease management. Devil facial tumour disease (DFTD) was first observed in 1996 and has spread throughout almost the entire Tasmanian devil geographic range, causing dramatic population declines. Whereas DFTD is predominantly spread via biting among adults, devils typically disperse as juveniles, which experience low DFTD prevalence. Thus, we predicted little association between devil and tumour population structure and that environmental factors influencing gene flow differ between devils and tumours. We employed a comparative landscape genetics framework to test the influence of environmental factors on patterns of isolation by resistance (IBR) and isolation by environment (IBE) in devils and DFTD. Although we found evidence for broad-scale costructuring between devils and tumours, we found no relationship between host and tumour individual genetic distances. Further, the factors driving the spatial distribution of genetic variation differed for each. Devils exhibited a strong IBR pattern driven by major roads, with no evidence of IBE. By contrast, tumours showed little evidence for IBR and a weak IBE pattern with respect to elevation in one of two tumour clusters we identify herein. Our results warrant caution when inferring pathogen spread using host population genetic structure and suggest that reliance on environmental barriers to host connectivity may be ineffective for managing the spread of wildlife diseases. Our findings demonstrate the utility of comparative landscape genetics for identifying differential factors driving host dispersal and pathogen transmission.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3233
页数:17
相关论文
共 123 条
  • [61] Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore
    Jones, ME
    Paetkau, D
    Geffen, E
    Moritz, C
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (08) : 2197 - 2209
  • [62] Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction
    Kamvar, Zhian N.
    Tabima, Javier F.
    Gruenwald, Niklaus J.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2014, 2 : 1 - 14
  • [63] The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals
    Keyghobadi, Nusha
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2007, 85 (10) : 1049 - 1064
  • [64] Urbanization reduces genetic connectivity in bobcats (Lynx rufus) at both intra- and interpopulation spatial scales
    Kozakiewicz, Christopher P.
    Burridge, Christopher P.
    Funk, W. Chris
    Salerno, Patricia E.
    Trumbo, Daryl R.
    Gagne, Roderick B.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Fisher, Robert N.
    Lyren, Lisa M.
    Jennings, Megan K.
    Riley, Seth P. D.
    Serieys, Laurel E. K.
    VandeWoude, Sue
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    Carver, Scott
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2019, 28 (23) : 5068 - 5085
  • [65] Pathogens in space: Advancing understanding of pathogen dynamics and disease ecology through landscape genetics
    Kozakiewicz, Christopher P.
    Burridge, Christopher P.
    Funk, W. Chris
    VandeWoude, Sue
    Craft, Meggan E.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    Ernest, Holly B.
    Fountain-Jones, Nicholas M.
    Carver, Scott
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 11 (10): : 1763 - 1778
  • [66] Evidence that disease-induced population decline changes genetic structure and alters dispersal patterns in the Tasmanian devil
    Lachish, S.
    Miller, K. J.
    Storfer, A.
    Goldizen, A. W.
    Jones, M. E.
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2011, 106 (01) : 172 - 182
  • [67] Langmead B, 2012, NAT METHODS, V9, P357, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.1923, 10.1038/nmeth.1923]
  • [68] Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils
    Lazenby, Billie T.
    Tobler, Mathias W.
    Brown, William E.
    Hawkins, Clare E.
    Hocking, Greg J.
    Hume, Fiona
    Huxtable, Stewart
    Iles, Philip
    Jones, Menna E.
    Lawrence, Clare
    Thalmann, Sam
    Wise, Phil
    Williams, Howel
    Fox, Samantha
    Pemberton, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (03) : 1368 - 1379
  • [69] Gene flow and pathogen transmission among bobcats (Lynx rufus) in a fragmented urban landscape
    Lee, Justin S.
    Ruell, Emily W.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Lyren, Lisa M.
    Alonso, Robert S.
    Troyer, Jennifer L.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    VandeWoude, Sue
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (07) : 1617 - 1631
  • [70] Multi-taxa integrated landscape genetics for zoonotic infectious diseases: deciphering variables influencing disease emergence
    Leo, Sarah S. T.
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    Millien, Virginie
    [J]. GENOME, 2016, 59 (05) : 349 - 361