The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:28
作者
Fourcade, Alexandre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Payrard, Charlotte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tissot, Valentin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Perrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Demany, Nicolas [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Serey-Effeil, Sophie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Callerot, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Coquet, Jean-Baptiste [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Doucet, Laurent [5 ]
Deruelle, Charles [1 ]
Joulin, Vincent [1 ]
Nonent, Michel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fournier, Georges [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Valeri, Antoine [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Brest, Serv Urol, Blvd Tanguy Prigent, Brest, France
[2] Univ Brest, Fac Med Sci Sante, Brest, France
[3] Univ Bretagne Loire, Rennes, France
[4] CHU Brest, Serv Radiol, Brest, France
[5] CHU Brest, Lab Anatomopathol, Brest, France
[6] Ctr Rech Pathol Prostat & Urol CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Biopsy; diagnosis; multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; IMAGING/ULTRASOUND-FUSION BIOPSY; RESONANCE-ULTRASOUND FUSION; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MEN; SURVEILLANCE; DIAGNOSIS; STILL;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2018.1438509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Compared with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies (SBx), targeted biopsies (TBx) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/TRUS fusion could increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa-s) and reduce non-significant PCa (PCa-ns). This study aimed to compare the performance of the two approaches. Materials and methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on all consecutive patients with PCa suspicion who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). All patients underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion TBx (two to four cores/target) using UroStation (TM) (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and SBx (10-12 cores) during the same session. PCa-s was defined as a maximal positive core length >= 4 mm or Gleason score >= 7. Results: The study included 191 patients (at least one suspicious lesion: PI-RADS >= 3). PCa was detected in 55.5% (106/191) of the cases. The overall PCa detection rate and the PCa-s detection rate were not significantly higher in TBx alone versus SBx (44.5% vs 46.1%, p = .7, and 38.2% vs 33.5%, p = .2, respectively). Combined TBx and SBx diagnosed significantly more PCa-s than SBx alone (45% vs 33.5%, p=.02). PCa-s was detected only by TBx in 12% of cases (23/191) and only by SBx in 7.3% (14/ 191). Gleason score was upgraded by TBx in 16.8% (32/191) and by SBx in 13.6% (26/191) of patients (p = 4). Conclusions: The combination of TBx and SBx achieved the best results for the detection and prognosis of PCa-s. The use of SBx alone would have missed the detection of PCa-s in 12% of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 179
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) :597-606
[22]   DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE-CANCER BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES [J].
TERRIS, MK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03) :829-832
[23]   Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Stabile, Armando ;
Dell'Oglio, Paolo ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Brembilla, Giorgio ;
Cristel, Giulia ;
Deho, Federico ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Maga, Tommaso ;
Losa, Andrea ;
Gaboardi, Franco ;
Cardone, Gianpiero ;
Esposito, Antonio ;
De Cobelli, Francesco ;
Del Maschio, Alessandro ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (02) :120-128
[24]   Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Wu, Jian ;
Xu, Guang ;
Xiang, Lihua ;
Guo, Lehang ;
Wang, Shuai ;
Dong, Lin ;
Sun, Liping .
OPEN MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (01)
[25]   Importance of Malignant Core Length in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Prostate Biopsies [J].
Dundar, Gokce ;
Erkan, Anil .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 10 (02) :93-100
[26]   A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies [J].
Morote, Juan ;
Picola, Natalia ;
Munoz-Rodriguez, Jesus ;
Paesano, Nahuel ;
Ruiz-Plazas, Xavier ;
Munoz-Rivero, Marta V. ;
Celma, Anna ;
Manuel, Gemma Garcia-de ;
Aisian, Ignacio ;
Servian, Pol ;
Abascal, Jose M. .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
[27]   Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Chaloupka, M. ;
Bischoff, R. ;
Pfitzinger, P. ;
Lellig, E. ;
Ledderose, S. ;
Buchner, A. ;
Schlenker, B. ;
Stief, C. ;
Clevert, D-A ;
Apfelbeck, M. .
CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 73 (01) :105-111
[28]   Fusion versus cognitive MRI-guided prostate biopsies in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Lockhart, Kathleen ;
Martin, Jarad ;
White, Martin ;
Raman, Avi ;
Grant, Alexander ;
Chong, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 17 (05) :504-510
[29]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[30]   Radiological semantics discriminate clinically significant grade prostate cancer [J].
Li, Qian ;
Lu, Hong ;
Choi, Jung ;
Gage, Kenneth ;
Feuerlein, Sebastian ;
Pow-Sang, Julio M. ;
Gillies, Robert ;
Balagurunathan, Yoganand .
CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (01)