The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Fourcade, Alexandre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Payrard, Charlotte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tissot, Valentin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Perrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Demany, Nicolas [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Serey-Effeil, Sophie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Callerot, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Coquet, Jean-Baptiste [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Doucet, Laurent [5 ]
Deruelle, Charles [1 ]
Joulin, Vincent [1 ]
Nonent, Michel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fournier, Georges [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Valeri, Antoine [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Brest, Serv Urol, Blvd Tanguy Prigent, Brest, France
[2] Univ Brest, Fac Med Sci Sante, Brest, France
[3] Univ Bretagne Loire, Rennes, France
[4] CHU Brest, Serv Radiol, Brest, France
[5] CHU Brest, Lab Anatomopathol, Brest, France
[6] Ctr Rech Pathol Prostat & Urol CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Biopsy; diagnosis; multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; IMAGING/ULTRASOUND-FUSION BIOPSY; RESONANCE-ULTRASOUND FUSION; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MEN; SURVEILLANCE; DIAGNOSIS; STILL;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2018.1438509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Compared with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies (SBx), targeted biopsies (TBx) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/TRUS fusion could increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa-s) and reduce non-significant PCa (PCa-ns). This study aimed to compare the performance of the two approaches. Materials and methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on all consecutive patients with PCa suspicion who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). All patients underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion TBx (two to four cores/target) using UroStation (TM) (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and SBx (10-12 cores) during the same session. PCa-s was defined as a maximal positive core length >= 4 mm or Gleason score >= 7. Results: The study included 191 patients (at least one suspicious lesion: PI-RADS >= 3). PCa was detected in 55.5% (106/191) of the cases. The overall PCa detection rate and the PCa-s detection rate were not significantly higher in TBx alone versus SBx (44.5% vs 46.1%, p = .7, and 38.2% vs 33.5%, p = .2, respectively). Combined TBx and SBx diagnosed significantly more PCa-s than SBx alone (45% vs 33.5%, p=.02). PCa-s was detected only by TBx in 12% of cases (23/191) and only by SBx in 7.3% (14/ 191). Gleason score was upgraded by TBx in 16.8% (32/191) and by SBx in 13.6% (26/191) of patients (p = 4). Conclusions: The combination of TBx and SBx achieved the best results for the detection and prognosis of PCa-s. The use of SBx alone would have missed the detection of PCa-s in 12% of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 179
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transperineal systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies are important in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Lahoud, John
    Doan, Paul
    Kim, Lawrence H.
    Patel, Manish, I
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (04) : 584 - 589
  • [2] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Verde, Francesco
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Romeo, Valeria
    Petretta, Mario
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (03) : 608 - 621
  • [3] Do Concomitant Systematic Biopsies Add to Fusion Targeted Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Thompson, Alice
    Eguru, Venkat
    Moosa, Sohail
    Ng, Yeung
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (03) : 169 - 177
  • [4] Are targeted prostate biopsies ready to replace systematic prostate biopsies?
    Celma, A.
    Lopez, R.
    Roche, S.
    Planas, J.
    Regis, L.
    Placer, J.
    Borque, A.
    Esteban, L. M.
    de Torres, I.
    Morote, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2019, 43 (10): : 573 - 578
  • [5] Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy and Per Core Detection Rate of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies Using Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography
    Boehm, Katharina
    Budaeus, Lars
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Schiffmann, Jonas
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Simonis, Kathrin
    Graefen, Markus
    Beyersdorff, Dirk
    Salomon, Georg
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [6] MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
    Tan, Teck Wei
    Png, Keng Siang
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Yuwono, Arianto
    Yeow, Yuyi
    Chong, Kian Tai
    Lee, Yee Mun
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Tan, Yung Khan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1111 - 1116
  • [7] Incidence of Significant Prostate Cancer in the Follow-Up of Patients With Suspicious Lesion on MRI and Ne gative Targeted and systematic Biopsies
    Siebert, Claire
    Nguyen, Truong-An
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Zambon, Audrey
    Saout, Kevin
    Deruelle, Charles
    Joulin, Vincent
    Tissot, Valentin
    Doucet, Laurent
    Fournier, Georges
    Valeri, Antoine
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2025, 23 (02)
  • [8] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [9] Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Andreas, Darian
    Mullane, Patrick
    Chappidi, Meera
    Joo, Sarah
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Agostino, Joseph
    Carter, Herbert B.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (06) : 793 - 798
  • [10] Utility of dynamic contrast enhancement for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
    Li, Eric V.
    Kumar, Sai K.
    Aguiar, Jonathan A.
    Siddiqui, Mohammad R.
    Neill, Clayton
    Sun, Zequn
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Jawahar, Anugayathri
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2024, 5 (09): : 865 - 873