Analysis on inverter selection for domestic rooftop solar photovoltaic system deployment

被引:9
作者
Ali, Hayder [1 ]
Khan, Hassan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lahore Univ Management Sci, Sch Sci & Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Lahore 54792, Pakistan
关键词
grid tied system; mismatch losses; partial shading; photovoltaic system; system configuration; PV ARRAY CONFIGURATIONS; MAXIMUM POWER; STAND-ALONE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; C-SI; RECONFIGURATION; MODULES; SIMULATION; IRRADIANCE; MISMATCH;
D O I
10.1002/2050-7038.12351
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Partial shading is a common occurrence in residential and commercial photovoltaic (PV) installations. It causes mismatch losses, particularly in string and central inverter-based systems, leading to output power loss and in turn lower performance ratio under partial shading conditions. The choice of string configuration itself is critical in lowering mismatch losses and the levelized energy cost. While a range of commercial inverters with different string configurations and prices are available, many standard string topologies are not optimum for common settings under various shading scenarios. Therefore, in this article, we evaluate various string configurations attached to state-of-the-art commercial inverters widely used in the industry from both mismatch loss and cost perspective. We quantify the impact of various shading scenarios on multiple inverter configurations to ascertain the relative performance of PV systems under symmetrical shading as well as random shading in field settings. For multiple PV system configurations (on a single rooftop), the mismatch loss varied up to 2.3% and 6% under symmetrical shading and field settings, respectively. The levelized cost of electricity also varies from 0.062$/kWh to 0.041$/kWh and is dependent on the type of inverter and string configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Measured performance evaluation of a 1.4 kW grid connected desert type PV in Oman [J].
Al-Badi, A. H. .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 47 :107-113
[2]   Techno-economic evaluation of two 42 kWp polycrystalline-Si and CIS thin-film based PV rooftop systems in Pakistan [J].
Ali, Hayder ;
Khan, Hassan Abbas .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 152 :347-357
[3]  
Ali H, 2018, IEEE ENER CONV, P1, DOI 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8558269
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 2009 34 PVSC
[5]   Particle Swarm Optimization Based Solar PV Array Reconfiguration of the Maximum Power Extraction Under Partial Shading Conditions [J].
Babu, Thanikanti Sudhakar ;
Ram, J. Prasanth ;
Dragicevic, Tomislav ;
Miyatake, Masafumi ;
Blaabjerg, Frede ;
Rajasekar, Natarajan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 9 (01) :74-85
[6]   Selection and configuration of inverters and modules for a photovoltaic system to minimize costs [J].
Baez-Fernandez, Hector ;
Ramirez-Beltran, Nazario D. ;
Mendez-Pinero, Mayra Ivelisse .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 :16-22
[7]   Reliability/cost-based multi-objective Pareto optimal design of stand-alone wind/PV/FC generation microgrid system [J].
Baghaee, H. R. ;
Mirsalim, M. ;
Gharehpetian, G. B. ;
Talebi, H. A. .
ENERGY, 2016, 115 :1022-1041
[8]   Global optimum economic designing of grid-connected photovoltaic systems with multiple inverters using binary linear programming [J].
Bakhshi-Jafarabadi, Reza ;
Sadeh, Javad ;
Soheili, Adel .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 183 :842-850
[9]   Analysis and comparison of different PV array configurations under partial shading conditions [J].
Bingol, Okan ;
Ozkaya, Burcin .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 160 :336-343
[10]   Mathematical model to estimate the maximum power output of a total cross tied connected PV array during partial shading condition [J].
Changmai, Papul ;
Nayak, Sisir Kumar ;
Metya, Sanjeev Kumar .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2019, 13 (14) :2647-2655