Migraine Nurses in Primary Care: Costs and Benefits

被引:8
|
作者
van den Berg, Jan S. P. [1 ]
Steiner, Timothy J. [2 ,3 ]
Veenstra, Petra J. L. [4 ]
Kollen, Boudewijn J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Isala, Dept Neurol, POB 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Imperial Coll London, Div Brain Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
HEADACHE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
migraine; burden; disability; management; primary care nurse; cost analysis; HEADACHE DISORDERS; IMPACT; BURDEN; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/head.13098
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-We examined the costs and benefits of introducing migraine nurses into primary care. Background.-Migraine is one of the most costly neurological diseases. Methods.-We analyzed data from our earlier nonrandomized cohort study comparing an intervention group of 141 patients, whose care was supported by nurses trained in migraine management, and a control group of 94 patients receiving usual care. Estimates of per-person direct costs were based on nurses' salaries and referrals to neurologists. Indirect costs were estimated as lost productivity, including numbers of days of absenteeism or with <50% productivity at work due to migraine, and notional costs related to lost days of household activities or days of <50% household productivity. Analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective. Results.-After 9 months the direct costs were (sic)281.11 in the control group against (sic)332.23 in the intervention group (mean difference -51.12; 95% CI: -113.20-15.56; P=.134); the indirect costs were (sic)1985.51 in the control group against (sic)1631.75 in the intervention group (mean difference 353.75; 95% CI: -355.53-1029.82; P=.334); and total costs were (sic)2266.62 in the control group, against (sic)1963.99 in the intervention group (mean difference 302.64; 95% CI: -433.46-1001.27; P=.438). When costs attributable to lost household productivity were included, total costs increased to (sic)6076.62 in the control group and (sic)5048.15 in the intervention group (mean difference 1028.47; 95% CI: -590.26-2603.67; P=.219). Conclusion.-Migraine nurses in primary care seemed in this study to increase practice costs but decrease total societal costs. However, it was a nonrandomized study, and the differences did not reach significance. For policy-makers concerned with headache-service organization and delivery, the important messages are that we found no evidence that nurses increased overall costs, and investment in a definitive study would therefore be worthwhile.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Employee and Employer Benefits From a Migraine Management Program: Disease Outcomes and Cost Analysis
    Schaetz, Leonhard
    Rimner, Timo
    Pathak, Purnima
    Fang, Juanzhi
    Chandrasekhar, Deepak
    Mueller, Jelena
    Sandor, Peter S.
    Gantenbein, Andreas R.
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (09): : 1947 - 1960
  • [22] Costs and effects of higher turnover of nurses and Aboriginal health practitioners and higher use of short-term nurses in remote Australian primary care services: an observational cohort study
    Zhao, Yuejen
    Russell, Deborah Jane
    Guthridge, Steven
    Ramjan, Mark
    Jones, Michael P.
    Humphreys, John S.
    Wakerman, John
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [23] Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care
    Laurant, Miranda
    van der Biezen, Mieke
    Wijers, Nancy
    Watananirun, Kanokwaroon
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    van Vught, Anneke J. A. H.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (07):
  • [24] Benefits and costs of rural sanitation interventions in Ghana
    Radin, Mark
    Wong, Brad
    McManus, Catherine
    Sinha, Saumitra
    Jeuland, Marc
    Larbi, Eugene
    Tuffuor, Benedict
    Biscoff, Noble Kofi
    Whittington, Dale
    JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (04) : 724 - 743
  • [25] Kidney Health: The importance of primary care in health care and in reducing system costs
    Del Amo, Miriam
    Garriga, Marcelo
    Rosales, Walter
    Touceda, Luis
    REVISTA DE NEFROLOGIA DIALISIS Y TRASPLANTE, 2024, 44 (01): : 42 - 47
  • [26] Awareness of Migraine Among Primary Care Physicians in Turkey: A Regional Study
    Gultekin, Murat
    Balci, Elcin
    Ismailogullari, Sevda
    Yetkin, Fatih
    Baydemir, Recep
    Erdogan, Fusun
    Mirza, Meral
    Ozge, Aynur
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2018, 55 (04): : 354 - 357
  • [27] Costs and benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation to COPD patients apply in primary health care
    Resqueti, Vanessa
    de Farias, Catharinne Carvalho
    Portela, Barbara
    Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Henrique
    Melo, Rodrigo
    Dias, Fernando Lavezzo
    Fregonezi, Guilherme
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [28] The Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Migraine in Primary Care
    Becker, Werner J.
    HEADACHE, 2017, 57 (09): : 1471 - 1481
  • [29] New guidelines for the management of migraine in primary care
    Dowson, AJ
    Lipscombe, S
    Sender, J
    Rees, T
    Watson, D
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2002, 18 (07) : 414 - 439
  • [30] New uses of the Migraine Screen Questionnaire (MS-Q): validation in the Primary Care setting and ability to detect hidden migraine. MS-Q in Primary Care
    Lainez, Miguel J.
    Castillo, Jesus
    Dominguez, Manuel
    Palacios, Gemma
    Diaz, Silvia
    Rejas, Javier
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2010, 10