Migraine Nurses in Primary Care: Costs and Benefits

被引:8
|
作者
van den Berg, Jan S. P. [1 ]
Steiner, Timothy J. [2 ,3 ]
Veenstra, Petra J. L. [4 ]
Kollen, Boudewijn J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Isala, Dept Neurol, POB 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Imperial Coll London, Div Brain Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
HEADACHE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
migraine; burden; disability; management; primary care nurse; cost analysis; HEADACHE DISORDERS; IMPACT; BURDEN; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/head.13098
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-We examined the costs and benefits of introducing migraine nurses into primary care. Background.-Migraine is one of the most costly neurological diseases. Methods.-We analyzed data from our earlier nonrandomized cohort study comparing an intervention group of 141 patients, whose care was supported by nurses trained in migraine management, and a control group of 94 patients receiving usual care. Estimates of per-person direct costs were based on nurses' salaries and referrals to neurologists. Indirect costs were estimated as lost productivity, including numbers of days of absenteeism or with <50% productivity at work due to migraine, and notional costs related to lost days of household activities or days of <50% household productivity. Analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective. Results.-After 9 months the direct costs were (sic)281.11 in the control group against (sic)332.23 in the intervention group (mean difference -51.12; 95% CI: -113.20-15.56; P=.134); the indirect costs were (sic)1985.51 in the control group against (sic)1631.75 in the intervention group (mean difference 353.75; 95% CI: -355.53-1029.82; P=.334); and total costs were (sic)2266.62 in the control group, against (sic)1963.99 in the intervention group (mean difference 302.64; 95% CI: -433.46-1001.27; P=.438). When costs attributable to lost household productivity were included, total costs increased to (sic)6076.62 in the control group and (sic)5048.15 in the intervention group (mean difference 1028.47; 95% CI: -590.26-2603.67; P=.219). Conclusion.-Migraine nurses in primary care seemed in this study to increase practice costs but decrease total societal costs. However, it was a nonrandomized study, and the differences did not reach significance. For policy-makers concerned with headache-service organization and delivery, the important messages are that we found no evidence that nurses increased overall costs, and investment in a definitive study would therefore be worthwhile.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses improve migraine management in primary care
    Veenstra, Petra
    Kollen, Boudewijn J.
    de Jong, Gosse
    Baarveld, Frans
    van den Berg, J. S. Peter
    CEPHALALGIA, 2016, 36 (08) : 772 - 778
  • [2] Migraine, Evaluation, and Management in Primary Health Care
    Alharbi, Raghad Abdulaziz
    Fatini, Fahad Mohammad
    Alqahtani, Mohammed Saeed
    Alsharif, Mohammed Ahmed
    Alqibti, Hussain Mesfer
    AlMutairi, AbdulAziz Muslet
    Alzahrani, Basmah Saeed
    Alabbad, Mandi Mahfood Y.
    AlZahrani, Adel Saud
    Alharbi, Sarah Suda Faleh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 9 (04): : 34 - 38
  • [3] Costs associated with outpatient, emergency room and inpatient care for migraine in the USA
    Insinga, Ralph P.
    Ng-Mak, Daisy S.
    Hanson, Mary E.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (15) : 1570 - 1575
  • [4] Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Primary Care
    Young, Nathan P.
    Philpot, Lindsey M.
    Vierkant, Robert A.
    Rosedahl, Jordan K.
    Upadhyaya, Sudhindra G.
    Harris, Ann
    Ebbert, Jon O.
    HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (07): : 1042 - 1051
  • [5] Do nurses improve migraine management in primary care?
    van den Berg, P.
    Kollen, B.
    Veenstra, P.
    de Jong, G.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15
  • [6] Disability, quality of life, productivity impairment and employer costs of migraine in the workplace
    Shimizu, Toshihiko
    Sakai, Fumihiko
    Miyake, Hitoshi
    Sone, Tomofumi
    Sato, Mitsuhiro
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Azuma, Yasuhiro
    Dodick, David W.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [7] Migraine burden and costs in France: a nationwide claims database analysis of triptan users
    Donnet, Anne
    Emery, Corinne
    Aly, Samia
    Allaf, Bashar
    Cayre, Fanny
    Mahieu, Nicolas
    Gourmelen, Julie
    Levy, Pierre
    Fagnani, Francis
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (07) : 616 - 624
  • [8] Migraine Screening in Primary Eye Care Practice: Current Behaviors and the Impact of Clinician Education
    Nguyen, Bao N.
    Singh, Sumeer
    Downie, Laura E.
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (08): : 1817 - 1829
  • [9] Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention
    Cowan, Robert
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    Rabany, Liron
    Harris, Dagan
    Vizel, Maya
    Ironi, Alon
    Vieira, Julio R. R.
    Galen, Michelle
    Treppendahl, Christina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 656 - 664
  • [10] Trends in utilization and costs of migraine medications, 2017-2020
    Nguyen, Jennifer L.
    Munshi, Kiraat
    Peasah, Samuel K.
    Swart, Elizabeth C. S.
    Kohli, Monal
    Henderson, Rochelle
    Good, Chester B.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2022, 23 (01)