Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design

被引:127
作者
Leder, H
Carbon, CC
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychol Basic Res, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Free Univ Berlin, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1002/acp.1088
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We report two studies in which the interplay between stimulus properties and perceiver characteristics in the appreciation car interiors was investigated. In Experiment I three design components, complexity, curvature and innovativeness, which are all thought to affect design appreciation were combined in a fully factorial design. All dimensions were confirmed to affect ratings, and curvature and innovativeness particularly affected the attractiveness ratings. Curved and non-innovative designs were generally preferred. Moreover, participants who were particularly interested in art were more sensitive to curvature and innovativeness. In Experiment 2 two dimensions of Experiment 1 were replicated using similar stimuli. Moreover, the specific effects of a design knowledge treatment were investigated. Results replicated the preference for curved and non-innovative (rather classic) designs. The treatment had only small effects, which support a general rather than dimension-specific effects of cognitive pre-information. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 618
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Arnheim R., 1954, ART VISUAL PERCEPTIO
[2]   NOVELTY, COMPLEXITY, AND HEDONIC VALUE [J].
BERLYNE, DE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1970, 8 (5A) :279-&
[3]  
Berlyne DE, 1974, STUDIES NEW EXPT AES
[4]   EXPOSURE AND AFFECT - OVERVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH, 1968-1987 [J].
BORNSTEIN, RF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (02) :265-289
[5]   PSYSCOPE - AN INTERACTIVE GRAPHIC SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING AND CONTROLLING EXPERIMENTS IN THE PSYCHOLOGY LABORATORY USING MACINTOSH COMPUTERS [J].
COHEN, J ;
MACWHINNEY, B ;
FLATT, M ;
PROVOST, J .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1993, 25 (02) :257-271
[6]   Product design, semantics and emotional response [J].
Demirbilek, O ;
Sener, B .
ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (13-14) :1346-1360
[7]  
Etcoff Nancy., 1999, SURVIVAL PRETTIEST S
[8]   PERSONAL PREFERENCES, AESTHETIC SENSITIVITY AND PERSONALITY IN TRAINED AND UNTRAINED SUBJECTS [J].
EYSENCK, HJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1972, 40 (04) :544-557
[9]   'Most advanced, yet acceptable': Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design [J].
Hekkert, P ;
Snelders, D ;
van Wieringen, PCW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 94 :111-124
[10]   Using semantic environment description as a tool to evaluate car interiors [J].
Karlsson, BSA ;
Aronsson, N ;
Svensson, KA .
ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (13-14) :1408-1422