Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis

被引:216
|
作者
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ]
Phadnis, Milind A.
Christein, John D. [2 ]
Wilcox, C. Mel
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Basil Hirschowitz Endoscop Ctr Excellence, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
NECROSECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1122
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis often leads to severe clinical deterioration necessitating open debridement or endoscopic necrosectomy. A new EUS-based approach was devised to manage this condition by creating multiple transluminal gateways to facilitate effective drainage of the necrotic contents. Objective: To compare treatment outcomes between patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically by a multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) or a conventional drainage technique (CDT). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care referral center. Patients: This study involved patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically. Intervention: in MTGT, 2 or 3 transmural tracts were created by using EUS guidance between the necrotic cavity and the GI lumen. While one tract was used to flush normal saline solution via a nasocystic catheter, multiple stents were deployed in others to facilitate drainage of necrotic contents. In the CDT, two stents with a nasocystic catheter were deployed via 1 transmural tract. Main Outcome Measurements: Resolution of symptoms, radiological findings on follow-up CT, and the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy. Results: Of 60 patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis, 12 (3 women, mean age 55.1 years) were managed by MTGT and 48 (12 women, mean age 55.2 years) by CDT. Treatment was successful in 11 of 12 (91.7%) patients managed by MTGT versus 25 of 48 (52.1%) managed by CDT (P = .01). Although 1 patient in the MTGT cohort required endoscopic necrosectomy, in the CDT cohort, 17 required surgery, 3 underwent endoscopic necrosectomy, and 3 died of multiple-organ failure. Treatment success was more likely for patients treated by MTGT than by CDT (adjusted odds ratio = 9.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-79.02; P = .04) when we adjusted for the size of the walled-off pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct stent placement. Limitations: Selective patient population. Conclusion: The EUS-guided MTGT is an effective treatment option for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis because it obviates the need for surgery and endoscopic necrosectomy and its attendant procedure-related morbidity. Prospective studies are required to confirm these preliminary but promising data. (Gastrointest Enclosc 2011;74:74-80.)
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainages after EUS-guided drainage for complicated multilocular walled-off necrosis (with videos)
    Mukai, Shuntaro
    Itoi, Takao
    Sofuni, Atsushi
    Itokawa, Fumihide
    Kurihara, Toshio
    Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Tsuji, Shujiro
    Ikeuchi, Nobuhito
    Tanaka, Reina
    Umeda, Junko
    Tonozuka, Ryosuke
    Honjo, Mitsuyoshi
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (03) : 531 - 535
  • [2] Controversies in EUS-guided treatment of walled-off necrosis
    Hocke, Michael
    Burmeister, Sean
    Braden, Barbara
    Jenssen, Christian
    Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
    Iglesias-Garcia, Julio
    Ignee, Andre
    Larghi, Alberto
    Moeller, Kathleen
    Rimbas, Mihai
    Sun Siyu
    Vanella, Giuseppe
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2022, 11 (06) : 442 - 457
  • [3] Endoscopic treatment of multilocular walled-off pancreatic necrosis with the multiple transluminal gateway technique
    Jagielski, Mateusz
    Smoczynski, Marian
    Adrych, Krystian
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2017, 12 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [4] Modified single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage technique for a huge infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A case report
    Minaga, Kosuke
    Kitano, Masayuki
    Imai, Hajime
    Yamao, Kentaro
    Kamata, Ken
    Miyata, Takeshi
    Matsuda, Tomohiko
    Omoto, Shunsuke
    Kadosaka, Kumpei
    Yoshikawa, Tomoe
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (21) : 5132 - 5136
  • [5] The role of MRCP for preventing pancreatic fluid collection recurrence after EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis
    Law, Ryan
    Storm, Andrew C.
    Vargas, Eric J.
    Martin, John A.
    Petersen, Bret T.
    Majumder, Shounak
    Vege, Santhi
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 101 (03) : 608 - 616
  • [6] Open transgastric debridement and internal drainage of symptomatic non-infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Munene, Gitonga
    Dixon, Elijah
    Sutherland, Francis
    HPB, 2011, 13 (04) : 234 - 239
  • [7] Robotic pancreatic necrosectomy and internal drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Wang, Yifan
    Yoshino, Osamu
    Driedger, Michael R.
    Beckman, Michael J.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Martinie, John B.
    HPB, 2023, 25 (07) : 813 - 819
  • [8] EUS-GUIDED DRAINAGE OF PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYSTS, ABSCESSES AND INFECTED NECROSIS
    Seewald, Stefan
    Ang, Tiing Leong
    Kim Teng, Karl C. Yu
    Soehendra, Nib
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 21 : S61 - S65
  • [9] Endoscopic and Percutaneous Drainage of Symptomatic Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis Reduces Hospital Stay and Radiographic Resources
    Gluck, Michael
    Ross, Andrew
    Irani, Shayan
    Lin, Otto
    Hauptmann, Ellen
    Siegal, Justin
    Fotoohi, Mehran
    Crane, Robert
    Robinson, David
    Kozarek, Richard A.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 8 (12) : 1083 - 1088
  • [10] Endoscopic transluminal drainage of walled-off necrosis: Does size matter?
    Voermans, Rogier P.
    Fockens, Paul
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (04) : 708 - 710