Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis

被引:222
作者
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ]
Phadnis, Milind A.
Christein, John D. [2 ]
Wilcox, C. Mel
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Basil Hirschowitz Endoscop Ctr Excellence, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
NECROSECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1122
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis often leads to severe clinical deterioration necessitating open debridement or endoscopic necrosectomy. A new EUS-based approach was devised to manage this condition by creating multiple transluminal gateways to facilitate effective drainage of the necrotic contents. Objective: To compare treatment outcomes between patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically by a multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) or a conventional drainage technique (CDT). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care referral center. Patients: This study involved patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically. Intervention: in MTGT, 2 or 3 transmural tracts were created by using EUS guidance between the necrotic cavity and the GI lumen. While one tract was used to flush normal saline solution via a nasocystic catheter, multiple stents were deployed in others to facilitate drainage of necrotic contents. In the CDT, two stents with a nasocystic catheter were deployed via 1 transmural tract. Main Outcome Measurements: Resolution of symptoms, radiological findings on follow-up CT, and the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy. Results: Of 60 patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis, 12 (3 women, mean age 55.1 years) were managed by MTGT and 48 (12 women, mean age 55.2 years) by CDT. Treatment was successful in 11 of 12 (91.7%) patients managed by MTGT versus 25 of 48 (52.1%) managed by CDT (P = .01). Although 1 patient in the MTGT cohort required endoscopic necrosectomy, in the CDT cohort, 17 required surgery, 3 underwent endoscopic necrosectomy, and 3 died of multiple-organ failure. Treatment success was more likely for patients treated by MTGT than by CDT (adjusted odds ratio = 9.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-79.02; P = .04) when we adjusted for the size of the walled-off pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct stent placement. Limitations: Selective patient population. Conclusion: The EUS-guided MTGT is an effective treatment option for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis because it obviates the need for surgery and endoscopic necrosectomy and its attendant procedure-related morbidity. Prospective studies are required to confirm these preliminary but promising data. (Gastrointest Enclosc 2011;74:74-80.)
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis [J].
Banks, Peter A. ;
Freeman, Martin L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (10) :2379-2400
[2]   Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Debridement of Pancreatic Necrosis [J].
Harrison, Sebron ;
Kakade, Manasi ;
Varadarajula, Shyam ;
Parden, Justin ;
Morgan, Desiree ;
Christein, John .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (02) :245-250
[3]   Management of the critically ill patient with severe acute pancreatitis [J].
Nathens, AB ;
Curtis, JR ;
Beale, RJ ;
Cook, DJ ;
Moreno, RP ;
Romand, JA ;
Skerreft, SJ ;
Stapleton, RD ;
Ware, LB ;
Waldmann, CS .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (12) :2524-2536
[4]   Combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of organized pancreatic necrosis [J].
Ross, Andrew ;
Gluck, Michael ;
Irani, Shayan ;
Hauptmann, Ellen ;
Fotoohi, Mehran ;
Siegal, Justin ;
Robinson, David ;
Crane, Robert ;
Kozarek, Richard .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (01) :79-84
[5]   Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study) [J].
Seifert, H. ;
Biermer, M. ;
Schmitt, W. ;
Juergensen, C. ;
Will, U. ;
Gerlach, R. ;
Kreitmair, C. ;
Meining, A. ;
Wehrmann, T. ;
Roesch, T. .
GUT, 2009, 58 (09) :1260-1266
[6]   CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy [J].
Takahashi, Naoki ;
Papachristou, Georgios I. ;
Schmit, Grant D. ;
Chahal, Prabhleen ;
LeRoy, Andrew J. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Vege, Santhi Swaroop ;
Mandrekar, Jayawant N. ;
Baron, Todd H. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (11) :2522-2529
[7]   Pancreatic necrosectomy: Definitions and technique [J].
Traverso, LW ;
Kozarek, RA .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (03) :436-439
[8]   Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections [J].
Trevino, Jessica M. ;
Tamhane, Ashutosh ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :526-531
[9]   A Step-up Approach or Open Necrosectomy for Necrotizing Pancreatitis [J].
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Bakker, Olaf J. ;
Hofker, H. Sijbrand ;
Boermeester, Marja A. ;
Dejong, Cornelis H. ;
van Goor, Harry ;
Schaapherder, Alexander F. ;
van Eijck, Casper H. ;
Bollen, Thomas L. ;
van Ramshorst, Bert ;
Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B. ;
Timmer, Robin ;
Lameris, Johan S. ;
Kruyt, Philip M. ;
Manusama, Eric R. ;
van der Harst, Erwin ;
van der Schelling, George P. ;
Karsten, Tom ;
Hesselink, Eric J. ;
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Bosscha, Koop ;
de Wit, Ralph J. ;
Houdijk, Alexander P. ;
van Leeuwen, Maarten S. ;
Buskens, Erik ;
Gooszen, Hein G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (16) :1491-1502
[10]   EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Varadarajulu, Shyam ;
Lopes, Tercio L. ;
Wilcox, C. Mel ;
Drelichman, Ernesto R. ;
Kilgore, Meredith L. ;
Christein, John D. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (04) :649-655