Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies

被引:10
作者
Ji, Ruoyu [1 ]
He, Zhangyuting [1 ]
Fang, Shiyuan [1 ]
Yang, Wenjie [2 ]
Wei, Mengchao [2 ]
Dong, Jie [2 ]
Xu, Weifeng [2 ]
Ji, Zhigang [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
nephroureterectomy; robot-assisted; laparoscopic; urothelial carcinomas; complications; treatment outcome; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; BLADDER CUFF EXCISION; RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY; ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; SURGERY; COSTS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.964256
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) are two minimally invasive surgical management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). Though more high-tech, it remains largely unclear whether RANU provides additional benefits over LNU. We aimed to quantitatively compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes between RANU and LNU. Methods: The systematic review was performed based on a registered protocol (registration number CRD42022319086). We searched through PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as conference proceedings and references of review articles (May 2022) for comparative studies reporting perioperative and oncologic outcomes independently in RANU and LNU groups. Selection of studies and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results of random-effects meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MD) or Odds ratio (OR), as appropriate. Subgroup and univariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify interstudy heterogeneities. Results: The review included 8470 patients undergoing RANU and 19872 patients undergoing LNU from 12 comparative original studies. RANU was associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.71, 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.81), longer operative time (MD=27.70, 95%CI: 0.83 to 54.60) and shorter length of stay (MD=-0.53, 95%CI: -0.98 to -0.07) compared to LNU. In addition, patients receiving RANU were more likely to have lymph node dissected (OR=2.61, 95%CI: 1.86 to 3.65). Recurrence and survival outcomes did not differ between two surgical procedures. Sample size, types of LNU and world region were major sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion: For UTUC patients, RANU offers fewer complications and shorter hospitalization. However, RANU requires longer operative time and shares similar oncologic outcomes compared to LNU. Further randomized designed studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MATCHED COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROURETERECTOMY: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
    Ambani, Sapan
    Weizer, Alon
    He, Chang
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    Hollenbeck, Brent
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) : E261 - E262
  • [2] Matched Comparison of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: An Initial Experience
    Ambani, Sapan N.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    He, Chang
    Miller, David C.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 345 - 349
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
  • [4] Assessment of Oncologic Control Obtained After Open Versus Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas (UUT-UCs): Results from a Large French Multicenter Collaborative Study
    Ariane, Mehdi Mokhtar
    Colin, Pierre
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Pignot, Geraldine
    Audouin, Marie
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Albouy, Baptiste
    Guillotreau, Julien
    Neuzillet, Yann
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Hurel, Sophie
    Arroua, Frederic
    Bigot, Pierre
    Marchand, Charles
    Fais, Pierre Olivier
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Saint, Fabien
    Ravier, Emmanuel
    Matte, Alexandre
    Guy, Laurent
    Bruyere, Franck
    Roupret, Morgan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 301 - 308
  • [5] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (04) : 939 - 949
  • [6] Laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy: does lymphadenectomy have an impact on the clinical outcome?
    Azawi, Nessn H.
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Thamsborg, Andreas Key Milan
    Dahl, Claus
    Jepsen, Jan Viberg
    Kroman-Andersen, Bjarne
    Poulsen, Johan
    Petersen, Helle Handler
    Olsen, L. Henning
    Jensen, Jorgen Bjerggaard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (10) : 1785 - 1792
  • [7] Comparison of Pediatric Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy and Laparoendoscopic Single-site Nephroureterectomy
    Bansal, Danesh
    Cost, Nicholas G.
    Bean, Christopher M.
    Riachy, Edward
    Defoor, W. Robert, Jr.
    Reddy, Pramod P.
    Minevich, Eugene A.
    Noh, Paul H.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 438 - 442
  • [8] Robot-assisted Radical Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies
    Crocerossa, Fabio
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Marchioni, Michele
    Ditonno, Pasquale
    Mir, Maria C.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Derweesh, Ithaar
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Damiano, Rocco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (04) : 428 - 439
  • [9] Robot-assisted Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-radioguided Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Using a DROP-IN Gamma Probe: The First Prospective Feasibility Study
    de Barros, Hilda A.
    van Oosterom, Matthias N.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    Hendrikx, Jeroen J. M. A.
    Vis, Andre N.
    Maurer, Tobias
    van Leeuwen, Fijs W. B.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (01) : 97 - 105
  • [10] Del Giudice F., 2021, CLIN GENITOURIN CANC, V20, P1981, DOI [10.1016/S0302-2838(22)00386-4, DOI 10.1016/S0302-2838(22)00386-4]