Multiobjective optimization of a flat-panel airlift reactor designed by computational fluid dynamics

被引:16
作者
Ansoni, Jonas Laerte [1 ]
Santiago, Patricia A. [1 ]
Seleghim, Paulo, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Av Trabalhador Sao Carlense 400, BR-13566970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Flat-panel airlift reactor; Automatic multiobjective optimization; CFD; Hydrodynamics; Shape optimization; BUBBLE-COLUMN; MASS-TRANSFER; PHOTOBIOREACTORS; CULTIVATION; MODELS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.041
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The optimization and scale-up process of industrial reactors maintaining optimum and homogeneous reaction conditions is a great challenge to engineers. For each final product, process and facility is necessary elaborate suitable strategies in order to allow a comprehensive and detailed process characterization to identify the most relevant process parameters influencing product yield and quality. Despite several research efforts to develop ideal reactors, these studies usually focus on trial-and-error optimization approach. This work was aimed to propose a numerical multiobjective optimization method and its application to the design of a flat-panel airlift (FPA) reactor. A preliminary study of the hydrodynamics of the reactor was conducted in a 61L FPA reactor. Experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were compared to demonstrate the viability of usage of the simplifications applied to CFD model in order to reduce the computational effort. The inner structure key parameters of a FPA reactor, including the ratio of the cross-section area of the downcomer to the cross-section area of the riser, are optimized vis-a-vis the flow aspects portrayed by the performance parameters, such as shear stress and residence time variations. An in-house computer package was used for the automatic CFD simulations and the optimization process. A Pareto-optimal front with possible solutions to the problem and a detailed investigation of the mixing performance of the possible optimal geometries were presented in the study herein. The results also showed the high influence of the geometric parameters on the hydrodynamics of the FPA reactor, that have to be taken in account in the scaling-up process. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 957
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Akhtar MA, 2007, CAN J CHEM ENG, V85, P290
[2]   Optimal industrial reactor design: development of a multiobjective optimization method based on a posteriori performance parameters calculated from CFD flow solutions [J].
Ansoni, Jonas Laerte ;
Seleghim, Paulo, Jr. .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2016, 91 :23-35
[3]   Drop impact onto a liquid layer of finite thickness: Dynamics of the cavity evolution [J].
Berberovic, Edin ;
van Hinsberg, Nils P. ;
Jakirlic, Suad ;
Roisman, Ilia V. ;
Tropea, Cameron .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 79 (03)
[4]   Application of computational fluid dynamics for modeling and designing photobioreactors for microalgae production: A review [J].
Bitog, J. P. ;
Lee, I. -B. ;
Lee, C. -G. ;
Kim, K. -S. ;
Hwang, H. -S. ;
Hong, S. W. ;
Seo, I. -H. ;
Kwon, K. -S. ;
Mostafa, E. .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2011, 76 (02) :131-147
[5]  
Chisti Y., 1998, Applied Mechanics Reviews, V51, P33, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.3098989
[6]   Influence of sparger on energy dissipation, shear rate, and mass transfer to sea water in a concentric-tube airlift bioreactor [J].
Contreras, A ;
García, F ;
Molina, E ;
Merchuk, JC .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 25 (10) :820-830
[7]   Hydrodynamic and mass transfer study in a rectangular three-phase air-lift loop reactor [J].
Couvert, A ;
Bastoul, D ;
Roustan, M ;
Chatellier, P .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2004, 43 (11) :1381-1387
[8]  
Dean J. A., 1998, LANGES HDB CHEM, DOI DOI 10.1080/10426919008953291
[9]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[10]  
Deb K., 2001, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM, DOI [10.1002/9780470496947, DOI 10.1002/9780470496947]