Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer

被引:6
作者
Liu, Xue-Hai [1 ]
Hu, Yi [2 ]
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Jiang, Yao-Guang [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Anesthesiol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2018年 / 32卷 / 11期
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; McKeown esophagectomy; Intraoperative conversion; Survival; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; LATERAL POSITION; EXPERIENCE; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6202-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to summarize the causes and implications of intraoperative conversion from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to open thoracotomy, and to evaluate the effect on long-term survival.MethodsThere were 293 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of the thoracic esophagus performed by the authors from September 2009 to August 2015. Totally, 257 patients were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups (those underwent complete MIE and those converted to open thoracotomy) and then compared. A standardized preoperative evaluation, as well as a postoperative method of following at a regular frequency were adopted for all of these patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics and the perioperative variables were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. And the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival differences.ResultsThere were 231 patients (89.9%) underwent successful thoracoscopic esophagectomy (Group 1), and 26 cases (10.1%) required conversion to open procedure (Group 2). The majority of conversion (73.1%, 19/26) occurred in the initial 100 cases. No significant difference in background or clinicopathologic factors between the two groups was observed, but patients in Group 2 had significantly longer operative time and more operative blood loss. Among the 26 patients of Group 2, there were nine cases that need emergent conversion for various reasons. And the most common cause for emergent conversion was intraoperative bleeding. Univariate and multivariate analyses all demonstrated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the overall or recurrence-free survival of these patients.ConclusionsUnivariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis indicated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the OS and RFS rate of these patients. Our results demonstrated that the intraoperative conversion did not affect the long-term survival of patients underwent MIE for ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:4517 / 4526
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) : 1887 - 1892
  • [2] A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy
    Burdall, Oliver C.
    Boddy, Alexander P.
    Fullick, James
    Blazeby, Jane
    Krysztopik, Richard
    Streets, Christopher
    Hollowood, Andrew
    Barham, Christopher P.
    Titcomb, Dan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (02): : 431 - 437
  • [3] Edge SB., 2009, AJCC cancer staging manual, V7th
  • [4] A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
    Gazala, Sayf
    Hunt, Ian
    Valji, Azim
    Stewart, Kenneth
    Bedard, Eric L. R.
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (06) : 962 - 964
  • [5] One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?
    Guo, Wei
    Zou, Ying-Bo
    Ma, Zheng
    Niu, Hui-Jun
    Jiang, Yao-Guang
    Zhao, Yun-Ping
    Gong, Tai-Qian
    Wang, Ru-Wen
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (04): : 1346 - 1352
  • [6] Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer
    Guo, Wei
    Zhao, Yun-Ping
    Jiang, Yao-Guang
    Niu, Hui-Jun
    Liu, Xue-Hai
    Ma, Zheng
    Wang, Ru-Wen
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05): : 1332 - 1336
  • [7] Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Review of Over 1000 Patients
    Luketich, James D.
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Awais, Omar
    Levy, Ryan M.
    Keeley, Samuel
    Shende, Manisha
    Christie, Neil A.
    Weksler, Benny
    Landreneau, Rodney J.
    Abbas, Ghulam
    Schuchert, Matthew J.
    Nason, Katie S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [8] Oncologic Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Extended Lymph Node Dissection: 10-year Experience from a Single Center
    Ninomiya, Itasu
    Okamoto, Kouichi
    Fujimura, Takashi
    Fushida, Sachio
    Osugi, Harushi
    Ohta, Tetsuo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (01) : 120 - 130
  • [9] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position - Experience of 130 patients
    Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
    Prakash, Anand
    Senthilkumar, Rangaswamy
    Senthilnathan, Palanisamy
    Parthasarathi, Ramakrishnan
    Rajan, Pidigu Seshiyer
    Venkatachlam, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [10] Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients
    Puntambekar, Shailesh P.
    Agarwal, Geetanjali A.
    Joshi, Saurabh N.
    Rayate, Neeraj V.
    Sathe, Ravindra M.
    Patil, Anjali M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (10): : 2407 - 2414