Spatial frequency-dependent signal-to-noise ratio as a generalized measure of image quality

被引:16
作者
Bernhardt, P [1 ]
Bätz, L [1 ]
Rührnschope, EP [1 ]
Hoheisel, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Siemens AG, Med Solut, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2005年 / 5745卷
关键词
medical X-ray imaging; image quality measure; DQE; contrast; noise; spatial resolution;
D O I
10.1117/12.593884
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A generalized, objective image quality measure can be defined for X-ray based medical projection imaging: the spatial frequency-dependent signal-to-noise ratio SNR = SNR(u,v). This function includes the three main image quality parameters, i.e. spatial resolution, object contrast, and noise. The quantity is intimately related to the DQE concept, however its focus is not to characterize the detector, but rather the detectability of a certain object embedded into a defined background. So also effects from focus size and radiation scatter can be quantified by this method. The SNR(u,v) is independent of basic linear post-processing steps such as appropriate windowing or spatial filtering. The consideration of the human visual system is beyond the scope of this concept. By means of this quantity, different X-ray systems and setups can be compared with each other and with theoretical calculations. Moreover, X-ray systems (i.e. detector, beam quality, geometry, anti-scatter grid, basic linear post-processing steps etc.) can be optimized to deliver the best object delectability for a given patient dose. In this paper SNR(u,v) is defined using analytical formulas. Furthermore, we demonstrate how it can be applied with a test phantom to a typical flat panel detector system by a combination of analytical calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. Finally the way this function can be used to optimize an X-ray imaging device is demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 418
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Aichinger H, 2004, RAD EXPOSURE IMAGE Q
[2]   Accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV [J].
Boone, JM ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1661-1670
[3]  
Cunningham I. A., 2000, HDB MED IMAGING, V1, P79
[4]   Cascaded models and the DQE of flat-panel imagers: Noise aliasing, secondary quantum noise and reabsorption [J].
Cunningham, IA ;
Yao, J ;
Subotic, V .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2002, 4682 :61-72
[5]   Image reconstruction and performance evaluation for ECG-gated spiral scanning with a 16-slice CT system [J].
Flohr, T ;
Ohnesorge, B ;
Bruder, H ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Simon, J ;
Suess, C ;
Schaller, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (10) :2650-2662
[6]   Image Quality optimization using an x-ray spectra model based optimization method [J].
Gordon, CL .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 3977 :456-465
[7]   Influence of x-ray pulse parameters on the image quality for moving objects in digital cardiac imaging [J].
Guibelalde, E ;
Vano, E ;
Vaquero, F ;
González, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2819-2825
[8]   Intrinsic spatial resolution of semiconductor X-ray detectors: a simulation study [J].
Hoheisel, M ;
Giersch, J ;
Bernhardt, P .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2004, 531 (1-2) :75-81
[9]   Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging [J].
Lu, B ;
Mao, SS ;
Zhuang, N ;
Bakhsheshi, H ;
Yamamoto, H ;
Takasu, J ;
Liu, SCK ;
Budoff, MJ .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (05) :250-256
[10]  
Rowlands J.A., 2000, Handbook of Medical Imaging, V1, P223, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1117/3.832716, DOI 10.1117/3.832716.CH4, DOI 10.1117/3.832716]