Vagus nerve stimulation intensity influences motor cortex plasticity

被引:59
|
作者
Morrison, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Hulsey, Daniel R. [2 ]
Adcock, Katherine S. [1 ,2 ]
Rennaker, Robert L., II [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kilgard, Michael P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hays, Seth A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Behav Brain Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Texas Biomed Device Ctr, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Erik Jonsson Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Vagus nerve stimulation; Motor training; ICMS; Plasticity; Cortical reorganization; Motor cortex; LOCUS-COERULEUS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; NEURAL ACTIVITY; RECOVERY; NOREPINEPHRINE; REHABILITATION; REORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; LTP;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb motor training enhances reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. Previous studies have shown an inverted-U relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in other brain areas, such that moderate intensity VNS yields greater cortical plasticity than low or high intensity VNS. However, the relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in the motor cortex is unknown. Objective: In this study we sought to test the hypothesis that VNS intensity exhibits an inverted-U relationship with the degree of motor cortex plasticity in rats. Methods: Rats were taught to perform a lever pressing task emphasizing use of the proximal forelimb musculature. Once proficient, rats underwent five additional days of behavioral training in which low intensity VNS (0.4 mA), moderate intensity VNS (0.8 mA), high intensity VNS (1.6 mA), or sham stimulation was paired with forelimb movement. 24 h after the completion of behavioral training, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was used to document movement representations in the motor cortex. Results: VNS delivered at 0.8 mA caused a significant increase in motor cortex proximal forelimb representation compared to training alone. VNS delivered at 0.4 mA and 1.6 mA failed to cause a significant expansion of proximal forelimb representation. Conclusion: Moderate intensity 0.8 mA VNS optimally enhances motor cortex plasticity while low intensity 0.4 mA and high intensity 1.6 mA VNS fail to enhance plasticity. Plasticity in the motor cortex exhibits an inverted-U function of VNS intensity similar to previous findings in auditory cortex. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation
    Stefan, K
    Kunesch, E
    Cohen, LG
    Benecke, R
    Classen, J
    BRAIN, 2000, 123 : 572 - 584
  • [42] Neurorehabilitation with vagus nerve stimulation: a systematic review
    Korupolu, Radha
    Miller, Alyssa
    Park, Andrew
    Yozbatiran, Nuray
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ananda, Roshan
    Roslan, Mohd Hariz Bin
    Wong, Lin Ling
    Botross, Nevein Philip
    Ngim, Chin Fang
    Mariapun, Jeevitha
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2023, 52 (03) : 239 - 250
  • [44] Plastic changes in primate motor cortex following paired peripheral nerve stimulation
    Habekost, Bonne
    Germann, Maria
    Baker, Stuart N.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 125 (02) : 458 - 475
  • [45] Cognition-Enhancing Vagus Nerve Stimulation Alters the Epigenetic Landscape
    Sanders, Teresa H.
    Weiss, Joseph
    Hogewood, Luke
    Chen, Lan
    Paton, Casey
    McMahan, Rebekah L.
    Sweatt, J. David
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 39 (18) : 3454 - 3469
  • [46] Vagus Nerve Stimulation Delivered with Motor Training Enhances Recovery of Function after Traumatic Brain Injury
    Pruitt, David T.
    Schmid, Ariel N.
    Kim, Lily J.
    Abe, Caroline M.
    Trieu, Jenny L.
    Choua, Connie
    Hays, Seth A.
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    Rennaker, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2016, 33 (09) : 871 - 879
  • [47] Vagus nerve stimulation does not improve recovery of forelimb motor or somatosensory function in a model of neuropathic pain
    Adcock, Katherine S.
    Danaphongse, Tanya
    Jacob, Sarah
    Rallapalli, Harshini
    Torres, Miranda
    Haider, Zainab
    Seyedahmadi, Armin
    Morrison, Robert A.
    Rennaker, Robert L.
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    Hays, Seth A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [48] The intensity of continuous theta burst stimulation, but not the waveform used to elicit motor evoked potentials, influences its outcome in the human motor cortex
    Sasaki, Takuya
    Kodama, Satoshi
    Togashi, Naohiko
    Shirota, Yuichiro
    Sugiyama, Yusuke
    Tokushige, Shin-ichi
    Inomata-Terada, Satomi
    Terao, Yasuo
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    Hamada, Masashi
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (02) : 400 - 410
  • [49] Optimizing Dosing of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Stroke Recovery
    Pruitt, David T.
    Danaphongse, Tanya T.
    Lutchman, Megan
    Patel, Nishi
    Reddy, Priyanka
    Wang, Vanesse
    Parashar, Anjana
    Rennaker, Robert L., II
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    Hays, Seth A.
    TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [50] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Lulic, Dzenan
    Ahmadian, Amir
    Baaj, Ali A.
    Benbadis, Selim R.
    Vale, Fernando L.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (03) : E5.1 - E5.5