Vagus nerve stimulation intensity influences motor cortex plasticity

被引:59
|
作者
Morrison, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Hulsey, Daniel R. [2 ]
Adcock, Katherine S. [1 ,2 ]
Rennaker, Robert L., II [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kilgard, Michael P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hays, Seth A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Behav Brain Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Texas Biomed Device Ctr, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Erik Jonsson Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Vagus nerve stimulation; Motor training; ICMS; Plasticity; Cortical reorganization; Motor cortex; LOCUS-COERULEUS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; NEURAL ACTIVITY; RECOVERY; NOREPINEPHRINE; REHABILITATION; REORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; LTP;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb motor training enhances reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. Previous studies have shown an inverted-U relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in other brain areas, such that moderate intensity VNS yields greater cortical plasticity than low or high intensity VNS. However, the relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in the motor cortex is unknown. Objective: In this study we sought to test the hypothesis that VNS intensity exhibits an inverted-U relationship with the degree of motor cortex plasticity in rats. Methods: Rats were taught to perform a lever pressing task emphasizing use of the proximal forelimb musculature. Once proficient, rats underwent five additional days of behavioral training in which low intensity VNS (0.4 mA), moderate intensity VNS (0.8 mA), high intensity VNS (1.6 mA), or sham stimulation was paired with forelimb movement. 24 h after the completion of behavioral training, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was used to document movement representations in the motor cortex. Results: VNS delivered at 0.8 mA caused a significant increase in motor cortex proximal forelimb representation compared to training alone. VNS delivered at 0.4 mA and 1.6 mA failed to cause a significant expansion of proximal forelimb representation. Conclusion: Moderate intensity 0.8 mA VNS optimally enhances motor cortex plasticity while low intensity 0.4 mA and high intensity 1.6 mA VNS fail to enhance plasticity. Plasticity in the motor cortex exhibits an inverted-U function of VNS intensity similar to previous findings in auditory cortex. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vagus nerve stimulation parameters evoke differential neuronal responses in the locus coeruleus
    Farrand, Ariana
    Jacquemet, Vincent
    Verner, Ryan
    Owens, Misty
    Beaumont, Eric
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2023, 11 (05):
  • [32] Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Mild Stimulation Intensity Exerts Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Effects in Parkinson's Disease Model Rats
    Kin, Ittetsu
    Sasaki, Tatsuya
    Yasuhara, Takao
    Kameda, Masahiro
    Agari, Takashi
    Okazaki, Mihoko
    Hosomoto, Kakeru
    Okazaki, Yosuke
    Yabuno, Satoru
    Kawauchi, Satoshi
    Kuwahara, Ken
    Morimoto, Jun
    Kin, Kyohei
    Umakoshi, Michiari
    Tomita, Yousuke
    Tajiri, Naoki
    Borlongan, Cesario, V
    Date, Isao
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [33] Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive functioning in rats with cerebral ischemia reperfusion
    Liu, Ai-fen
    Zhao, Feng-bo
    Wang, Jing
    Lu, Yi-Fan
    Tian, Jian
    Zhao, Yin
    Gao, Yan
    Hu, Xia-jun
    Liu, Xiao-yan
    Tan, Jie
    Tian, Yun-li
    Shi, Jing
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 14
  • [34] Effects of the vagus nerve stimulation on amygdalohypothalamic and amygdalobulbular influences
    Lyubashina O.A.
    Nozdrachev A.D.
    Doklady Biological Sciences, 2010, 434 (1) : 313 - 317
  • [35] Study protocol for a pivotal randomised study assessing vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitation for improved upper limb motor function after stroke
    Kimberley, Teresa J.
    Prudente, Cecilia N.
    Engineer, Navzer D.
    Pierce, David
    Tarver, Brent
    Cramer, Steven C.
    Dickie, David Alexander
    Dawson, Jesse
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2019, 4 (04) : 363 - 377
  • [36] Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway
    Borland, Michael S.
    Vrana, Will A.
    Moreno, Nicole A.
    Fogarty, Elizabeth A.
    Buell, Elizabeth P.
    Vanneste, Sven
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    Engineer, Crystal T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 122 (02) : 659 - 671
  • [37] Acute Cardiovascular Responses to Vagus Nerve Stimulation after Experimental Spinal Cord Injury
    Sachdeva, Rahul
    Krassioukov, Andrei, V
    Bucksot, Jesse E.
    Hays, Seth A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2020, 37 (09) : 1149 - 1155
  • [38] Vagus nerve stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: Neural substrates, neuromodulatory effects and therapeutic implications
    Schambra, Heidi M.
    Hays, Seth A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2025, 603 (03): : 723 - 735
  • [39] Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training enhances recovery of forelimb function after ischemic stroke in aged rats
    Hays, Seth A.
    Ruiz, Andrea
    Bethea, Thelma
    Khodaparast, Navid
    Carmel, Jason B.
    Rennaker, Robert L., II
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2016, 43 : 111 - 118
  • [40] Application of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
    Fallahi, Mohammad Sadegh
    Azadnajafabad, Sina
    Maroufi, Seyed Farzad
    Pour-Rashidi, Ahmad
    Khorasanizadeh, MirHojjat
    Sattari, Shahab Aldin
    Faramarzi, Sina
    Slavin, Konstantin, V
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 174 : 11 - 24