Are agricultural support policies harmful to the environment? Evidence from Japanese farm-level policy simulation

被引:1
作者
Sasaki, Hiroki [1 ]
Katayama, Naoki [2 ]
Okubo, Satoru [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Agr Forestry & Fisheries, Policy Res Inst, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Agr & Food Res Org, Inst Agroenvironm Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
agri-environmental payments; environmental harmful subsidy; Japan; market price support; paddy fields;
D O I
10.1017/age.2021.16
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This study presents the environmental impacts of agricultural policy instruments as evidence from an ex-ante farm-level policy simulation model in Japan. Simulations did indicate that all types of agri-environmental payments achieved the environmental benefit for the land studied. Conversely, market price support does not inevitably increase nitrogen runoff or greenhouse gas emissions at any time since paddy fields themselves have the function of purifying water pollution and work as a biodiversity nursery. The direction and magnitude of the policy impacts are an empirical matter that should be considered carefully at a local level.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 511
页数:27
相关论文
共 39 条
[22]  
MAFF-Japan, 2013, FY2013 ANN REP FOOD
[23]  
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 2007, DEV AGR PROD MAN TEC
[24]   Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a paddy field with Japanese conventional water management and fertilizer application [J].
Nishimura, S ;
Sawamoto, T ;
Akiyama, H ;
Sudo, S ;
Yagi, K .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2004, 18 (02) :GB20171-10
[25]  
OECD, 2010, LINK AGR POL ENV EFF
[26]  
OECD, 2017, G7 TARG PHAS OUT ENV
[27]  
OECD, 2003, AGR BIOD DEV IND POL
[28]  
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, OECD Publications, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264012059-EN
[29]  
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2019, INN AGR PROD SUST JA
[30]   Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies [J].
Pannell, DJ .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (02) :139-152