Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial

被引:13
作者
den Dekker, Bianca M. [1 ]
Bakker, Marije F. [2 ]
de Lange, Stephanie, V [1 ,2 ]
Veldhuis, Wouter B. [1 ]
van Diest, Paul J. [3 ]
Duvivier, Katya M. [4 ]
Lobbes, Marc B., I [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Loo, Claudette E. [8 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [9 ]
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. [2 ]
Veltman, Jeroen [10 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [1 ,11 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary, POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Pathol, POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sthool Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Med Imaging, Sittard Geleen, Netherlands
[8] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[10] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Radiol, Almelo, Netherlands
[11] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2021210325
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: High breast density increases breast cancer risk and lowers mammographic sensitivity. Supplemental MRI screening improves cancer detection but increases the number of false-positive screenings. Thus, methods to distinguish true-positive MRI screening results from false-positive ones are needed. Purpose: To build prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings to reduce the rate of false-positive screening MRI findings in women with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods: Clinical characteristics and MRI findings in Dutch breast cancer screening participants (age range, 50-75 years) with positive first-round MRI screening results (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, or 5) after a normal screening mammography with extremely dense breasts (Volpara density category 4) were prospectively collected within the randomized controlled Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial from December 2011 through November 2015. In this secondary analysis, prediction models were built using multivariable logistic regression analysis to distinguish true-positive MRI screening findings from false-positive ones. Results: Among 454 women (median age, 52 years; interquartile range, 50-57 years) with a positive MRI result in a first supplemental MRI screening round, 79 were diagnosed with breast cancer (true-positive findings), and 375 had false-positive MRI results. The full prediction model (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.92), based on all collected clinical characteristics and MRI findings, could have prevented 45.5% (95% CI: 39.6, 51.5) of false-positive recalls and 21.3% (95% CI: 15.7, 28.3) of benign biopsies without missing any cancers. The model solely based on readily available MRI findings and age had a comparable performance (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88; P =.15) and could have prevented 35.5% (95% CI: 30.4, 41.1) of false-positive MRI screening results and 13.0% (95% CI: 8.8, 18.6) of benign biopsies. Conclusion: Prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings may be useful to reduce the false-positive first-round screening MRI rate and benign biopsy rate in women with extremely dense breasts. (C) RSNA, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 292
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, 2013, ACR BIRADS ATL BREAS
  • [2] Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue
    Bakker, Marije F.
    de Lange, Stephanie V.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    de Jong, Matthijn D. F.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Mali, Willem P. T. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) : 2091 - 2102
  • [3] False-Positive Findings at Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A BI-RADS Descriptor Study
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Benndorf, Matthias
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Gajda, Mieczyslaw
    Runnebaum, Ingo B.
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) : 1658 - 1663
  • [4] Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Zhang, Zheng
    Lehrer, Daniel
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Barr, Richard G.
    Boehm-Velez, Marcela
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Evans, W. Phil, III
    Larsen, Linda H.
    Morton, Marilyn J.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    Farria, Dione M.
    Cormack, Jean B.
    Marques, Helga S.
    Adams, Amanda
    Yeh, Nolin M.
    Gabrielli, Glenna
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13): : 1394 - 1404
  • [5] Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
    Boyd, Norman F.
    Guo, Helen
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Sun, Limei
    Stone, Jennifer
    Fishell, Eve
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Hislop, Greg
    Chiarelli, Anna
    Minkin, Salomon
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [6] Application of Abbreviat d Protocol of Magnetic Resonance imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in Dense Breast Tissue
    Chen, Shuang-Qing
    Huang, Min
    Shen, Yu-Ying
    Liu, Chen-Lu
    Xu, Chuan-Xiao
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 316 - 320
  • [7] Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications
    Cintolo-Gonzalez, Jessica A.
    Braun, Danielle
    Blackford, Amanda L.
    Mazzola, Emanuele
    Acar, Ahmet
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    Griffin, Molly
    Hughes, Kevin S.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) : 263 - 284
  • [8] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening
    Comstock, Christopher E.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    Snyder, Bradley S.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Bergin, Jennifer T.
    Rahbar, Habib
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jacobs, Christina
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Nicholson, Mary H.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Holt, Jacqueline
    Prather, Andrew
    Miller, Kathy D.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (08): : 746 - 756
  • [9] Reasons for (non) participation in supplemental population-based MRI breast screening for women with extremely dense breasts
    de Lange, S., V
    Bakker, M. F.
    Monninkhof, E. M.
    Peeters, P. H. M.
    de Koekkoek-Doll, P. K.
    Mann, R. M.
    Rutten, M. J. C. M.
    Bisschops, R. H. C.
    Veltman, J.
    Duvivier, K. M.
    Lobbes, M. B., I
    de Konin, H. J.
    Karssemeijer, N.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    Veldhuis, W. B.
    van Gils, C. H.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (08) : 759.e1 - 759.e9
  • [10] MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    de Jong, Mathijn D. F.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Mali, Willem P. Th M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (02) : 527 - 537