Sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic measures with multiple sites per unit

被引:11
作者
Drake, C
Levine, RA
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Stat, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
dependent data; sensitivity; specificity; magnetic resonance imaging; diagnostic tests;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.008
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Medical researchers often study the performance of diagnostic tools. The performance of the diagnostic tool is evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity and similar measures. Sensitivity is defined as the probability of a positive diagnostic test in a patient with the illness or injury for which the test serves as a diagnostic tool. Specificity is the probability of a negative diagnostic test in a patient free of the disease or injury. For some conditions, the test is applied to several anatomic locations or at different times in a patient and each test can be positive or negative. The findings of the tests performed on the same patient are correlated and any summary measure should account for this correlation. We propose a summary measure for the subject that combines the results from all tests performed on the same patient while accounting for the correlation. The measure is easily calculated and requires no specific statistical software. We also provide an estimate of the standard error and confidence intervals. The method is illustrated with a study, conducted at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, of the sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and plain film (PF) radiography in detecting injuries in the cervical spine, such as fractures and soft tissue injuries. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[2]   ESTIMATION OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF SITE-SPECIFIC DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
HUJOEL, PP ;
MOULTON, LH ;
LOESCHE, WJ .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 25 (04) :193-196
[3]   Acute cervical spine injuries prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center [J].
Katzberg, RW ;
Benedetti, PF ;
Drake, CM ;
Ivanovic, M ;
Levine, RA ;
Beatty, CS ;
Nemzek, WR ;
McFall, RA ;
Ontell, FK ;
Bishop, DM ;
Bishop, DM ;
Poirier, VC ;
Chong, BW .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :203-212
[4]  
Lehmann E., 1983, Theory of Point Estimation
[5]   ACUTE CERVICAL-SPINE TRAUMA - EVALUATION WITH 1.5-T MR IMAGING [J].
MIRVIS, SE ;
GEISLER, FH ;
JELINEK, JJ ;
JOSLYN, JN ;
GELLAD, F .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (03) :807-816
[6]  
Orrison Jr WW, 1995, EMERG RADIOL, V2, P120
[7]   Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard [J].
Sardanelli, F ;
Giuseppetti, GM ;
Panizza, P ;
Bazzocchi, M ;
Fausto, A ;
Simonetti, G ;
Lattanzio, V ;
Del Maschio, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (04) :1149-1157
[8]   Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in men is dependent on site-specific analysis [J].
Stoch, SA ;
Wysong, E ;
Connolly, C ;
Parker, RA ;
Greenspan, SL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (04) :311-317