Area level deprivation and monthly COVID-19 cases: The impact of government policy in England

被引:32
作者
Morrissey, Karyn [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Spooner, Fiona [2 ]
Salter, James [3 ,4 ]
Shaddick, Gavin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol Management & Econ, DTU Management, Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Univ Exeter, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Sch Engn Math & Phys Sci, Math, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Joint Ctr Excellence Environm Intelligence, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
关键词
COVID-19; cases; Deprivation; Panel data analysis; Government policy; England; LONGITUDINAL DATA; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114413
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper aims to understand the relationship between area level deprivation and monthly COVID-19 cases in England in response to government policy throughout 2020. The response variable is monthly reported COVID19 cases at the Middle Super Output Area (MSOA) level by Public Health England, with Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), ethnicity (percentage of the population across 5 ethnicity categories) and the percentage of the population older than 70 years old and time as predictors. A GEE population-averaged panel-data model was employed to model trends in monthly COVID-19 cases with the population of each MSOA included as the exposure variable. Area level deprivation is significantly associated with COVID-19 cases from March 2020; however, this relationship is reversed in December 2020. Follow up analysis found that this reversal was maintained when controlling for the novel COVID-19 variant outbreak in the South East of England. This analysis indicates that changes in the role of deprivation and monthly reported COVID-19 over time cases may be linked to two government policies: (1) the premature easing of national restrictions in July 2020 when cases were still high in the most deprived areas in England and (2) the introduction of a regional tiered system in October predominantly in the North of England. The analysis adds to the evidence showing that deprivation is a key driver of COVID-19 outcomes and highlights the unintended negative impact of government policy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Letters of request: how to obtain the English evidence you need
[2]   Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis [J].
Ballinger, GA .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2004, 7 (02) :127-150
[3]  
Barr B, 2021, EVALUATING IMPACTS T
[4]  
Bibby J., 2020, Technical report
[5]   Spatial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing, Positivity, Confirmed Cases, and Mortality in 3 US Cities An Ecological Study [J].
Bilal, Usama ;
Tabb, Loni P. ;
Barber, Sharrelle ;
Roux, Ana V. Diez .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (07) :936-+
[6]   Macroeconomic Nowcasting and Forecasting with Big Data [J].
Bok, Brandyn ;
Caratelli, Daniele ;
Giannone, Domenico ;
Sbordone, Argia M. ;
Tambalotti, Andrea .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 10, 2018, 10 :615-643
[7]  
Brunsdon C, 2021, MEASURING EXPOSURE B
[8]   North-South disparities in English mortality 1965-2015: longitudinal population study [J].
Buchan, Iain E. ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Sperrin, Matthew ;
Chandola, Tarani ;
Doran, Tim .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2017, 71 (09) :928-936
[9]  
Cabinet Office, 2017, RACE DISP AUD SUMM F
[10]   How does vulnerability to COVID-19 vary between communities in England? Developing a Small Area Vulnerability Index (SAVI) [J].
Daras, Konstantinos ;
Alexiou, Alexandros ;
Rose, Tanith C. ;
Buchan, Iain ;
Taylor-Robinson, David ;
Barr, Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 75 (08) :729-734