Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid

被引:36
作者
Straatman, L. V. [1 ]
Rietveld, A. C. M. [2 ]
Beijen, J. [1 ]
Mylanus, E. A. M. [1 ]
Mens, L. H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Linguist, NL-6525 HT Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
MULTICHANNEL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; TEMPORAL PERIODICITY CUES; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; SPEECH RECOGNITION; LEXICAL SEGMENTATION; AUDITORY-SYSTEM; PITCH; DISCRIMINATION; SENSITIVITY; NOISE;
D O I
10.1121/1.3474236
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Cochlear implants are largely unable to encode voice pitch information, which hampers the perception of some prosodic cues, such as intonation. This study investigated whether children with a cochlear implant in one ear were better able to detect differences in intonation when a hearing aid was added in the other ear ("bimodal fitting"). Fourteen children with normal hearing and 19 children with bimodal fitting participated in two experiments. The first experiment assessed the just noticeable difference in F0, by presenting listeners with a naturally produced bisyllabic utterance with an artificially manipulated pitch accent. The second experiment assessed the ability to distinguish between questions and affirmations in Dutch words, again by using artificial manipulation of F0. For the implanted group, performance significantly improved in each experiment when the hearing aid was added. However, even with a hearing aid, the implanted group required exaggerated F0 excursions to perceive a pitch accent and to identify a question. These exaggerated excursions are close to the maximum excursions typically used by Dutch speakers. Nevertheless, the results of this study showed that compared to the implant only condition, bimodal fitting improved the perception of intonation. (C) 2010 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3474236]
引用
收藏
页码:1884 / 1895
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   MODELING THE PERCEPTION OF CONCURRENT VOWELS - VOWELS WITH DIFFERENT FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES [J].
ASSMANN, PF ;
SUMMERFIELD, Q .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (02) :680-697
[2]   Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations [J].
Berenstein, Carlo K. ;
Mens, Lucas H. M. ;
Mulder, Jef J. S. ;
Vanpoucke, Filiep J. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (02) :250-260
[3]  
Boersma P., 2006, Praat: doing phonetics by computer
[4]  
BOSMAN AJ, 1989, THESIS U UTRECHT NET
[5]   INTONATION AND THE PERCEPTUAL SEPARATION OF SIMULTANEOUS VOICES [J].
BROKX, JPL ;
NOOTEBOOM, SG .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1982, 10 (01) :23-36
[6]   Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing [J].
Brown, Christopher A. ;
Bacon, Sid P. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (03) :1658-1665
[7]   Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition [J].
Chatterjee, Monita ;
Peng, Shu-Chen .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 235 (1-2) :143-156
[8]   Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Incerti, P ;
Hill, M .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (01) :9-21
[9]   The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees [J].
Ciocca, V ;
Francis, AL ;
Aisha, R ;
Wong, L .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 111 (05) :2250-2256
[10]   Influence of voice similarity on talker discrimination in children with normal hearing and cochlear implants [J].
Cleary, M ;
Pisoni, DB ;
Kirk, KI .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2005, 48 (01) :204-223