Applying a realist(ic) framework to the evaluation of a new model of emergency department based mental health nursing practice

被引:27
作者
Wand, Timothy [1 ]
White, Kathryn [1 ]
Patching, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
关键词
critical realism; evaluation; mental health nursing; mixed methods; nurse practitioner; realistic evaluation; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00488.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Evaluation has become progressively popular within public health and healthcare programme research, with an emphasis on outcomes and a desire to improve practice and service delivery. Mixed methods approaches are consequently being employed to capture the multidimensional characteristics of programmes that aim to address problematic situations affecting targeted populations. This paper provides an overview of critical realism, a modern philosophical perspective that seeks contextualised causal understandings of social phenomena. Realistic evaluation, a research methodology adapted from critical realism, is highlighted as a means of obtaining a deeper appreciation of how complex programmes work, for whom they work, and under what circumstances. The evaluation of a mental health nurse practitioner outpatient service based in the emergency department of a large teaching hospital in Sydney Australia is used to illustrate the application of a realist perspective to research in nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 239
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Angus J.a. M., 2006, Oncology Nursing Forum, V33, P62
  • [2] Using a nursing framework to measure client satisfaction at a nurse-managed clinic
    Bear, M
    Bowers, C
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 1998, 15 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [3] Befani B., 2007, EVALUATION-US, V13, P171, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1356389007075222, 10.1177/1356389007075222]
  • [4] Critical realism: a philosophical framework for the study of gender and mental health
    Bergin, Michael
    Wells, John S. G.
    Owen, Sara
    [J]. NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 9 (03) : 169 - 179
  • [5] Bezzi C., 2006, Evaluation, V12, P56, DOI DOI 10.1177/1356389006064189
  • [6] Blamey A., 2007, EVALUATION-US, V13, P439, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1356389007082129, 10.1177/1356389007082129]
  • [7] Byng R., 2005, EVALUATION-US, V11, P69, DOI DOI 10.1177/1356389005053198
  • [8] Clark Alexander M, 2008, ANS Adv Nurs Sci, V31, pE67, DOI 10.1097/01.ANS.0000341421.34457.2a
  • [9] Green JC., 2001, Evaluation, V7, P25
  • [10] Johnson R. B., 2004, ED RES, V33, P14, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X033007014, 10.3102/0013189X033007014]