Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests

被引:46
作者
Khan, KS [1 ]
Bachmann, LM
ter Riet, G
机构
[1] Birmingham Womens Hlth Care NHS Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Birmingham B15 2TG, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2003年 / 108卷 / 02期
关键词
hysteroscopy; postmenopausal; endometrium;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00098-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Systematic literature reviews with meta-analysis of reported data in diagnostic research studies about the accuracy of tests assist clinicians in decision-making. However, there are limitations to this approach as the analysis of such data often does not allow reviewers to explore the diagnostic information gained from combinations of tests. In recent years meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) has been introduced as gold standard analytic approach in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Application of IPD meta-analysis in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests can allow advanced analysis to decipher the real value of testing. In particular, the additional information provided by testing can be examined in light of the information already known from history and examination. To our knowledge there are no IPD meta-analyses in diagnostic research so far. This commentary aims to highlight the benefits of IPD meta-analysis in the diagnostic domain and demonstrates how strategies for diagnostic work-up of women with postmenopausal bleeding could be improved using this approach in systematic reviews of diagnostic research on accuracy of ultrasound and hysteroscopy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] BACHMANN LM, 2003, IN PRESS ACTA OBSTET
  • [2] Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia - A systematic quantitative review
    Clark, TJ
    Voit, D
    Gupta, JK
    Hyde, C
    Song, FJ
    Khan, KS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (13): : 1610 - 1621
  • [3] Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1783, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1783::AID-SIM497>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-B
  • [5] Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a meta-analysis
    Gupta, JK
    Chien, PFW
    Voit, D
    Clark, TJ
    Khan, KS
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 81 (09) : 799 - 816
  • [6] Medicine - Communicating statistical information
    Hoffrage, U
    Lindsey, S
    Hertwig, R
    Gigerenzer, G
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5500) : 2261 - 2262
  • [7] HONEST H, 2003, IN PRESS EUR J OBSTE
  • [8] Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests
    Khan, KS
    Dinnes, J
    Kleijnen, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (01): : 6 - 11
  • [9] MIETTINEN OS, 1994, STAT MED, V13, P201, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780130302
  • [10] Evaluation of diagnostic imaging tests: Diagnostic probability estimation
    Miettinen, OS
    Henschke, CI
    Yankelevitz, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) : 1293 - 1298