Evaluation of active and passive seismic earth pressures considering internal friction and cohesion

被引:39
|
作者
Xu, Shi-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Shamsabadi, Anoosh [3 ]
Taciroglu, Ertugrul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Architecture & Civil Engn Dept, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Caltrans, Off Earthquake Engn, Sacramento, CA 95816 USA
关键词
Earth pressure; Earth force; Retaining wall; Limit equilibrium; Method of slices; Cohesion; c-phi soil; Log-Spiral-Rankine model; Mononobe-Okabe model; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.004
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The Log-Spiral-Rankine (LSR) model, which is a generalized formulation for assessing the active and passive seismic earth pressures considering the internal friction and cohesion of backfill soil, is reviewed and improved in this study. System inconsistencies in the LSR model are identified, which result from an inaccurate assumption on the vertical normal stress field (sigma(z)=gamma z) in a general c-phi soil medium, and from omitting the effect of soil cohesion when solving for the stress states along the failure surface. The remedies to the said inconsistencies are presented, and local and global iteration schemes are introduced to solve the resulting highly coupled multivariate nonlinear system of equations. The modified LSR model provides a more complete and accurate solution for earth retaining systems, including the geometry of the mobilized soil body, the stress state along the failure surface, as well as the magnitude and the point of application of the resultant earth thrust. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 47
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RESPONSE OF A CONCRETE BRIDGE CONSIDERING THE USE OF PASSIVE OR ACTIVE SEISMIC PROTECTION DEVICES
    Racanel, Ionut Radu
    Daraban, Marian
    Urdareanu, Vlad Daniel
    16TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE, SGEM 2016: SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES IN GEOLOGY, EXPLORATION AND MINING, VOL III, 2016, : 607 - 614
  • [22] Probabilistic assessment of passive earth pressures considering spatial variability of soil parameters and design factors
    Shiau, Jim
    Nguyen, Tan
    Pham-Tran-Hung, Thinh
    Sugawara, Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [23] Seismic imaging at the cross-roads: Active, passive, exploration and solid Earth
    Rawlinson, N.
    Stephenson, R.
    Carbonell, R.
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2017, 718 : 1 - 8
  • [24] Distribution of non-linear seismic active earth pressure of cohesion backfill on retaining wall
    Chen, Xian-Mai
    Tao, Xia-Xin
    Wang, Fu-Tong
    Chen, Xue-Liang
    Cui, Gao-Hang
    Li, Guan-Qi
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (New Series), 2009, 16 (SUPPL. 1) : 77 - 83
  • [25] Active and passive critical slip fields for cohesionless soils and calculation of lateral earth pressures
    Zhu, DY
    Qian, QH
    Lee, CF
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2001, 51 (05): : 407 - 423
  • [26] Influence of pore water pressure on concrete creep and a creep model considering the effect of cohesion and internal friction angle
    Liu, Wenbo
    Zhang, Shuguang
    FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2024, 47 (04) : 1082 - 1098
  • [27] Calculation of passive earth pressures on retaining wall considering soil arching effects of backfill clayey soil
    Zhou Xiao-long
    Ma Kang
    Qian Ming
    Liu De-wen
    Zhao Qi
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2014, 35 : 245 - 250
  • [29] Revisiting Seismic Active/Passive Earth Pressure in Nonuniform Cohesive-Frictional Backfill
    Qin, Changbing
    Chian, Siau Chen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2020, 20 (06)
  • [30] Active and passive remote sensing for supporting the evaluation of the urban seismic vulnerability
    Borfecchia, Flavio
    Pollino, Maurizio
    De Cecco, Luigi
    Lugari, Alessandro
    Martini, Sandro
    La Porta, Luigi
    Ristoratore, Elisabetta
    Pascale, Carmine
    RIVISTA ITALIANA DI TELERILEVAMENTO, 2010, 42 (03): : 129 - 141