The Parallel Analysis of Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery (PSIR) and Double Inversion Recovery (DIR) Images Significantly Improves the Detection of Cortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) since Clinical Onset

被引:32
|
作者
Favaretto, Alice [1 ]
Poggiali, Davide [1 ]
Lazzarotto, Andrea [1 ]
Rolma, Giuseppe [2 ]
Causin, Francesco [2 ]
Gallo, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Multiple Sclerosis Ctr Veneto Reg CeSMuV, Dept Neurosci SNPSRR, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Padova, Neuroradiol Unit, Padua, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
INTRACORTICAL LESIONS; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MRI; DEMYELINATION; ATROPHY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0127805
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Double inversion recovery (DIR) detects only a minority (<20%) of cortical lesions (CL) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) was suggested to be substantially superior to DIR in the detection of cortical lesions (CL). These two sequences might be complementary. Objectives To analyze CL frequency and type in MS patients having different disease duration and disability, including patients at clinical onset, and to discern more correctly the artifacts, by combining DIR and PSIR images. Patients and Methods 40 patients were enrolled in the study: 10 clinically isolated syndrome/early relapsing remitting MS (CIS/eRRMS), 24 relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), 6 secondary progressive MS (SPMS). DIR and PSIR images were jointly used to classify lesions as purely intracortical (IC), leukocortical (LC) and juxtacortical (JC). Results PSIR disclosed CL in 100% of the patients and was capable of identifying more than four times lesions (455.5%, p<0.00001), especially IC (mean numbers: 36.5 in CIS/eRRMS, 45.0 in RRMS and 52.3 in SPMS) and LC (mean numbers: 10.9 in CIS/eRRMS, 20.1 in RRMS and 25.3 in SPMS), compared to DIR (p<0.00001). CL number was significantly higher in SPMS compared to RRMS (p<0.0001). Artifacts were more accurately identified by comparing the two sequences. Conclusions Our study confirms the higher ability of PSIR in disclosing and classifying CL. The presence of CL in all CIS patients further points out the relevance of cortical pathology in MS. Whether the parallel analysis of DIR and PSIR images may be useful for diagnostic purposes, especially when a diagnosis of MS is suspected but not confirmed by routine MRI, needs to be evaluated in larger patient series. The analysis of the cortex by DIR and PSIR may also allow a better stratification of the patients for prognostic and counseling purposes, as well as for their inclusion in clinical studies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele is associated with intracortical lesions on three-dimensional double inversion recovery images in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis
    Shinoda, Koji
    Matsushita, Takuya
    Nakamura, Yuri
    Masaki, Katsuhisa
    Yamasaki, Ryo
    Yamaguchi, Hiroo
    Togao, Osamu
    Hiwatashi, Akio
    Kira, Jun-ichi
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 710 - 720
  • [22] 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
    Goujon, Adrien
    Mirafzal, Sonia
    Zuber, Kevin
    Deschamps, Romain
    Sadik, Jean-Claude
    Gout, Olivier
    Savatovsky, Julien
    Lecler, Augustin
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [23] Phase sensitive reconstruction of T1-weighted inversion recovery in the evaluation of the cervical cord lesions in Multiple Sclerosis; is it similarly eligible in 1.5 T magnet fields?
    Shayganfar, A.
    Sarrami, A. H.
    Fathi, S.
    Shaygannejad, V
    Shamsian, S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2018, 23 : 17 - 22
  • [24] Comparison of Sagittal FSE T2, STIR, and T1-Weighted Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery in the Detection of Spinal Cord Lesions in MS at 3T
    Alcaide-Leon, P.
    Pauranik, A.
    Alshafai, L.
    Rawal, S.
    Oh, J.
    Montanera, W.
    Leung, G.
    Bharatha, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (05) : 970 - 975