Innate and adaptive immunity in wild rodents spontaneously and experimentally infected with the tick-borne encephalitis virus

被引:9
|
作者
Morozova, Olga, V [1 ,2 ]
Panov, Victor V. [3 ]
Bakhvalova, Valentina N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Russian Minist Hlth, Ivanovsky Inst Virol, Natl Res Ctr Epidemiol & Microbiol NF Gamaleya, 16 Gamaleya St, Moscow 123098, Russia
[2] Fed Med Biol Agcy Russia, Fed Res & Clin Ctr Phys Chem Med, 1a Malaya Pirogovskaya St, Moscow 119435, Russia
[3] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Systemat & Ecol Anim, Siberian Branch, 11 Frunze St, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia
关键词
Tick-borne encephalitis virus; Northern red-backed vole Myodes rutilus (Pallas; 1779); Striped field mouse Apode agrarius (Pallas; 1771); Cytokines; Virus-neutralizing and hemagglutination inhibition antibodies; WESTERN SIBERIA; SMALL MAMMALS; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104187
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Two dominant species of wild small rodents trapped in Novosibirsk region, South-Western Siberia, Russia differed in their susceptibility to the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) infection. TBEV RNA average detection rate for Northern red-backed vole Myodes rutilus (Pallas, 1779) (82.2 +/- 5.8% blood samples and 63.1 +/- 2.7% organ samples) significantly exceeded the corresponding values for the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius (Pallas, 1771) (47.0 +/- 8.7% blood and 24.5 +/- 2.8% organ samples) (p < 0.001). Innate immunity may be one of possible reasons of the differences. Thl cytokine gene expression distinguished between M. rutilus (12.5 +/- 8.5%) and A. agrarius (66.6 +/- 11.4%), whereas Th2 cytokine frequencies were statistically similar (81.8 +/- 12.2% and 100.0%, respectively). Polarization indexes (PI) of the innate immunity calculated as ratio of Th2 to Thl cytokine RNA detection rates for both M. rutilus (6.5) and A. agrarius (1.5) suggested Th2 mainly humoral immune response against persistent TBEV in natural mammalian hosts. Therefore, the TBEV-induced antibodies were analyzed by ELISA and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests. The TBEV-specific antibodies were detected in 74.8 +/- 4.3% sera of M. rutilus and 67.3 +/- 6.8% of A. agrarius. Among them HI antibodies were found in 4.8 +/- 2.1% of the same analyzed sera of M. rutilus and in 6.0 +/- 3.4% blood samples of A. agrarius only. To model the TBEV persistence both M. rutilus and A. agrarius were infected with the suspensions of the TBEVinfected ticks with further observations during 4 subsequent months. Detection rate of the TBEV RNA and antigen E remained high during the whole period, however, pathogenic for laboratory suckling mice virus was isolated up to 8 days postinfection. At late stages of the persistent infection (1-4 months) the TBEV RNA detection rate in northern red-backed voles remained high 70.6 +/- 7.9% whereas in striped field mice significantly declined to 26.7 +/- 9.2% (p < .001). Comparative analysis of the innate immunity of the wild rodents in 2 months postinfection showed similar frequencies of Th2 cytokine gene expression for M. rutilus (77.8 +/- 10.1%) and A. agrarius (71.4 +/- 12.5%) (p > .05) but Thl cytokine mRNA detection rates were different (44.4 +/- 12.5% and 85.7 +/- 9.7%, respectively) (p < .05). In 2 months PI decreased from 6.5 until 1.75 for M. rutilus and from 1.5 until 0.83 for A. agrarius. Nevertheless, Th2 mainly humoral immune response was confirmed by direct detection of the TBEV-specific antibodies. HI and neutralizing antibodies were revealed in blood sera of the small rodents of both studied species in 30 days postinfection and remained at detectable levels during 4 months of observations. Accordingly, Th2 polarized innate immunity of small rodents might facilitate the TBEV intracellular persistence in the presence of HI and neutralization antibodies.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tick-borne encephalitis virus in dogs - is this an issue?
    Pfeffer, Martin
    Dobler, Gerhard
    PARASITES & VECTORS, 2011, 4
  • [42] Detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus in the UK
    Holding, Maya
    Dowall, Stuart
    Hewson, Roger
    LANCET, 2020, 395 (10222): : 411 - 411
  • [43] Incidence from coincidence:: patterns of tick infestations on rodents facilitate transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus
    Randolph, SE
    Miklisová, D
    Lysy, J
    Rogers, DJ
    Labuda, M
    PARASITOLOGY, 1999, 118 : 177 - 186
  • [44] Genetic and Biological Characterization of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Isolated from Wild Rodents in Southern Hokkaido, Japan in 2008
    Kentaro, Yoshii
    Yamazaki, Shoko
    Mottate, Keita
    Nagata, Noriyo
    Seto, Takahiro
    Sanada, Takashiro
    Sakai, Mizuki
    Kariwa, Hiroaki
    Takashima, Ikuo
    VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2013, 13 (06) : 406 - 414
  • [45] HEMAGGLUTINATION TEST WITH TICK-BORNE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS
    LEVKOVICH, E
    IZOTOV, VK
    VOPROSY VIRUSOLOGII, 1961, 6 (04): : 428 - +
  • [46] ON TRANSMISSION OF TICK-BORNE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS BY FLEAS
    SMETANA, A
    ACTA VIROLOGICA, 1965, 9 (04) : 375 - &
  • [47] Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus: A Structural View
    Pulkkinen, Lauri I. A.
    Butcher, Sarah J.
    Anastasina, Maria
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2018, 10 (07):
  • [48] Molecular Organisation of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus
    Pulkkinen, Lauri I. A.
    Barrass, Sarah, V
    Domanska, Ausra
    Overby, Anna K.
    Anastasina, Maria
    Butcher, Sarah J.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (04):
  • [49] Tick-borne encephalitis virus in dogs - is this an issue?
    Martin Pfeffer
    Gerhard Dobler
    Parasites & Vectors, 4
  • [50] TICK-BORNE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS IN SOUTHERN IRELAND
    WALTON, GA
    KENNEDY, RC
    BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1966, 122 (10): : 427 - &