Oncological and functional results after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients

被引:0
|
作者
Sanchez-Nunez, Juan E. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Cuenca, Eduardo [1 ]
Fernandez-Noyola, Gerardo [2 ]
Gonzalez-Bonilla, Eduardo A. [1 ]
Doria-Lozano, Mario [1 ]
Rosas-Nava, Jesus E. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Corona-Montes, Victor E. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Hosp Gen Mexico Dr Eduardo Liceaga, Unidad Uro Oncol, Serv Urol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Gen Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Div Urol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Hosp Angeles Pedregal, Serv Urol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] San Angel Inn Univ, Ctr Cirugia Robot, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Ctr Med ABC, Serv Urol, Amer British Cowdray Observ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS | 2022年 / 90卷
关键词
Pentafecta; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; High-risk; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; PUBOVESICAL COMPLEX; PENTAFECTA OUTCOMES; MEN; PRESERVATION; RADIATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.24875/CIRU.20001371
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pentafecta is currently the standard in the comprehensive evaluation of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the objective of this study is the evaluation of oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer of high risk undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Method: Descriptive, retrospective study of 20 cases with a diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer. The high-risk group is composed of a prostate-specific antigen equal or greater than 20 ng/mL, Gleason score equal or greater than 8, or clinical stages T2/T3 treated with robotic approach. Results: Biochemical control was achieved from the first six weeks after the surgical event. 75% (n = 15) had negative surgical margins. 100% of the patients (n = 20) presented urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter. Erectile function was preserved at 3, 6 and 12 months in 100% of the patients who underwent neuropreservation but with use of an PDE inhibitor. (n = 5). Complications were reported in 10% (Clavien-Dindo I-II). Conclusions: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer is considered an appropriate treatment option in selected patients. A different experimental design is needed to define the advantages or disadvantages of this approach, as well as to determine its role and application in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncological and functional outcomes of high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Lee, Yu Khun
    Kuo, Hann-Chorng
    Wang, Jen-Hung
    Jiang, Yuan-Hong
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [2] The Role of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Srougi, Victor
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael R.
    Nunes-Silva, Igor
    Baghdadi, Mohammed
    Garcia-Barreras, Silvia
    Rembeyo, Gregory
    Eiffel, Sophie S.
    Barret, Eric
    Rozet, Francois
    Galiano, Marc
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (03) : 229 - 237
  • [3] Oncological Outcomes of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Taiwan
    Liao, Chieh-Chun
    Lu, Yu-Chuan
    Tai, Huai-Chin
    Chen, Chung-Hsin
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [4] Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram
    Abdollah, Firas
    Klett, Dane E.
    Sood, Akshay
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Pucheril, Daniel
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Diaz, Mireya
    Peabody, James O.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (05) : 703 - 712
  • [5] Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the management of high-risk prostate cancer
    Sood, Akshay
    Jeong, Wooju
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Klett, Dane E.
    Abdollah, Firas
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Menon, Mani
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (04) : 410 - 417
  • [6] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [7] Long-term oncological results of treatment for high-risk prostate cancer using radical prostatectomy in a cancer hospital
    Rubio-Briones, J.
    Ramirez-Backhaus, M.
    Gomez-Ferrer, A.
    Mir, C.
    Dominguez-Escrig, J.
    Collado, A.
    Iborra, I.
    Casanova, J.
    Solsona, E.
    Mascaros, J. M.
    Calatrava, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2018, 42 (08): : 507 - 515
  • [8] The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk organ-confined prostate cancer
    Salkini, Mohamad Waseem
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2020, 12 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [9] Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with or Without Adjuvant Treatments
    Devlies, Wout
    Silversmit, Geert
    Ameye, Filip
    Dekuyper, Peter
    Quackels, Thierry
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Van Damme, Nancy
    Claessens, Frank
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Joniau, Steven
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2025, 8 (01): : 56 - 65
  • [10] Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Inkaya, Abdurrahman
    Tahra, Ahmet
    Sobay, Resul
    Kumcu, Ali
    Kucuk, Eyup Veli
    Boylu, Ugur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (06): : 410 - 417