Getting on board: The monitoring effect of institutional directors

被引:15
作者
Jiang, George J. [1 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Dept Finance & Management Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Coll Business Adm, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
关键词
Institutional investors; Board of Directors; Institutional monitoring; Informational efficiency; Firm performance; Corporate policies; CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST; HEDGE FUND ACTIVISM; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AGENCY COSTS; OWNERSHIP; INVESTORS; DISCLOSURE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101865
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We identify a sample of firms with directors employed by institutional investors and examine the effect of a direct channel of institutional monitoring. Using difference-in-differences tests, we find weak evidence that institutional directors have a positive effect on informational efficiency. More importantly, institutional directors have a significantly positive impact on stock returns over the long run. Further analysis shows that the presence of institutional directors leads to a slight increase of managerial entrenchment. Consistent with the notion that entrenched managers reduce risk-taking, we also find significant decreases in R&D investments and financial leverage, and significant increases in payouts for firms with institutional directors. The findings suggest that aligning with the interest of long-term investors, institutional directors deter firms from pursuing potentially value-decreasing investment projects and influence firms to return value to investors through lower debts and higher payouts, mainly share repurchases.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   COMMON RISK-FACTORS IN THE RETURNS ON STOCKS AND BONDS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
FRENCH, KR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 33 (01) :3-56
[32]   SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL [J].
FAMA, EF ;
JENSEN, MC .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1983, 26 (02) :301-325
[33]   Motivated monitors: The importance of institutional investors' portfolio weights [J].
Fich, Eliezer M. ;
Harford, Jarrad ;
Tran, Anh L. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 118 (01) :21-48
[34]   Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world [J].
Francis, JR ;
Khurana, IK ;
Pereira, R .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2005, 80 (04) :1125-1162
[35]   Institutional Investors on Boards: Does Their Behavior Influence Corporate Finance? [J].
Garcia-Meca, Emma ;
Lopez-Iturriaga, Felix ;
Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 146 (02) :365-382
[36]   The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States [J].
Gillan, Stuart L. ;
Starks, Laura T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2007, 19 (01) :55-+
[37]   Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview [J].
Gillan, Stuart L. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (03) :381-402
[38]   Institutional investors and equity prices [J].
Gompers, PA ;
Metrick, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :229-259
[39]   Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs [J].
Harford, Jarrad ;
Li, Kai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (02) :917-949
[40]   Do long-term investors improve corporate decision making? [J].
Harford, Jarrad ;
Kecskes, Ambrus ;
Mansi, Sattar .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 50 :424-452