Getting on board: The monitoring effect of institutional directors

被引:13
作者
Jiang, George J. [1 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Dept Finance & Management Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Coll Business Adm, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
关键词
Institutional investors; Board of Directors; Institutional monitoring; Informational efficiency; Firm performance; Corporate policies; CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST; HEDGE FUND ACTIVISM; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AGENCY COSTS; OWNERSHIP; INVESTORS; DISCLOSURE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101865
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We identify a sample of firms with directors employed by institutional investors and examine the effect of a direct channel of institutional monitoring. Using difference-in-differences tests, we find weak evidence that institutional directors have a positive effect on informational efficiency. More importantly, institutional directors have a significantly positive impact on stock returns over the long run. Further analysis shows that the presence of institutional directors leads to a slight increase of managerial entrenchment. Consistent with the notion that entrenched managers reduce risk-taking, we also find significant decreases in R&D investments and financial leverage, and significant increases in payouts for firms with institutional directors. The findings suggest that aligning with the interest of long-term investors, institutional directors deter firms from pursuing potentially value-decreasing investment projects and influence firms to return value to investors through lower debts and higher payouts, mainly share repurchases.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] LARGE SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM, RISK SHARING, AND FINANCIAL MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
    ADMATI, AR
    PFLEIDERER, P
    ZECHNER, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (06) : 1097 - 1130
  • [2] Empire-builders and shirkers: Investment, firm performance, and managerial incentives
    Aggarwal, Rajesh K.
    Samwick, Andrew A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (03) : 489 - 515
  • [3] Blockholders on Boards and CEO Compensation, Turnover and Firm Valuation
    Agrawal, Anup
    Nasser, Tareque
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2019, 9 (03)
  • [4] Aguilera Ruth V., 2009, IS MANAGERIAL ENTREN
  • [5] Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation
    Almazan, A
    Hartzell, JC
    Starks, LT
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 34 (04) : 5 - 34
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, BEST PRACTICES QUANT
  • [7] Passive investors, not passive owners
    Appel, Ian R.
    Gormley, Todd A.
    Keim, Donald B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 (01) : 111 - 141
  • [8] Institutional Investment Horizons and the Cost of Equity Capital
    Attig, Najah
    Cleary, Sean
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 42 (02) : 441 - 477
  • [9] What Matters in Corporate Governance?
    Bebchuk, Lucian
    Cohen, Alma
    Ferrell, Allen
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) : 783 - 827
  • [10] Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund
    Becht, Marco
    Franks, Julian
    Mayer, Colin
    Rossi, Stefano
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (08) : 3093 - 3129