Techniques for Quantifying Methane Production Potential in the Anaerobic Digestion Process

被引:20
作者
Casallas-Ojeda, Miguel [1 ]
Meneses-Bejarano, Sully [1 ]
Uruena-Argote, Ronald [1 ]
Fernando Marmolejo-Rebellon, Luis [1 ]
Torres-Lozada, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle, Fac Engn, Study & Control Environm Pollut ECCA Res Grp, Calle 13 100-00, Cali, Colombia
关键词
Batch assay; Biochemical methane potential (BMP); Experimental methods; Theoretical methods; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; OF-THE-ART; CO-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION; HEADSPACE PRESSURE; ORGANIC FRACTION; BMP; ENERGY; PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-021-01636-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic substrates, such as food waste (FW) present in municipal solid waste (MSW), is a biological alternative that contributes to the meeting of Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13 by producing both digestate (soil conditioner) and methane (renewable energy). In this regard, the methods used to quantify methane production are important to examine. Through a bibliometric analysis (2008-2020) in Scopus and Scielo databases, two different methods-experimental and theoretical-were identified: Experimental methods include volumetric, manometric as well as other experimental methods. Due to their simplicity and low cost of implementation, volumetric methods are the most widely used, particularly in developing countries. It was also found that gas chromatography is used mainly as a complementary method to estimate biogas composition. Theoretical methods may overestimate methane production because they assume that all organic matter is degraded. Furthermore, variables such as the reactor volume, headspace, barrier solution (i.e., acidic, or alkaline), and particle size, among others, should be further studied, to standardize quantification methods and compare results between studies. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:2493 / 2510
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Performance assessment of a wind power plant using standard exergy and extended exergy accounting (EEA) approaches [J].
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Tabatabaei, Meisam ;
Hosseini, Seyed Sina ;
Dashti, Behrouz B. ;
Soufiyan, Mohamad Mojarab .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 171 :127-136
[2]   Single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of extruded lignocellulosic biomass [J].
Akobi, Chinaza ;
Yeo, Hyeongu ;
Hafez, Hisham ;
Nakhla, George .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 :548-559
[3]  
Al Seadi T., 2008, Biogas handbook
[4]   Selection of inocula conditioning methodologies for the anaerobic digestion of food waste [J].
Alexis Parra-Orobio, Brayan ;
Nieto-Mendoza, Melkin ;
Rivera-Henao, Diego ;
Cesar Manyoma-Velasquez, Pablo ;
Torres-Lozada, Patricia .
REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2019, (92) :9-18
[5]   A detailed assessment of resource of biomethane from first, second and third generation substrates [J].
Allen, Eoin ;
Wall, David M. ;
Herrmann, Christiane ;
Murphy, Jerry D. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 87 :656-665
[6]   Solid anaerobic digestion: State-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles [J].
Andre, Laura ;
Pauss, Andre ;
Ribeiro, Thierry .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 247 :1027-1037
[7]   Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays [J].
Angelidaki, I. ;
Alves, M. ;
Bolzonella, D. ;
Borzacconi, L. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Guwy, A. J. ;
Kalyuzhnyi, S. ;
Jenicek, P. ;
van Lier, J. B. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :927-934
[8]   Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants [J].
Angelidaki I. ;
Sanders W. .
Re/Views in Environmental Science & Bio/Technology, 2004, 3 (2) :117-129
[9]  
Aquino Sérgio F., 2007, Eng. Sanit. Ambient., V12, P192
[10]   Energy and Nutrients' Recovery in Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Biomass: An Italian Perspective for Future Applications [J].
Battista, Federico ;
Frison, Nicola ;
Bolzonella, David .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (17)