An exploration of men's experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: A mixed methods study protocol

被引:2
作者
Ruane-McAteer, Eimear [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Joe [2 ]
Porter, Sam [1 ]
Venderbos, Lionne [3 ]
Prue, Gillian [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Ctr Med Biol, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast BT9 7BL, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Belfast City Hosp, NICC, 51 Lisburn Rd, Belfast BT9 7AB, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Psychological adjustment; Anxiety; Depression; Uncertainty; Mixed methods; Quality of life; MEMORIAL ANXIETY SCALE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VALIDATION; UNCERTAINTY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-016-2605-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common male cancers worldwide. Active Surveillance (AS) has been developed to allow men with lower risk disease to postpone or avoid the adverse side effects associated with curative treatments until the disease progresses. Despite the medical benefits of AS, it is reported that living with untreated cancer can create a significant emotional burden for patients. Methods/design: The aim of this study is to gain insight into the experiences of men eligible to undergo AS for favourable-risk PCa. This study has a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design consisting of two phases: quantitative followed by qualitative. Phase 1 has a multiple point, prospective, longitudinal exploratory design. Ninety men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer will be assessed immediately post-diagnosis (baseline) and followed over a period of 12 months, in intervals of 3 month. Ninety age-matched men with no cancer diagnosis will also be recruited using peer nomination and followed up in the same 3 month intervals. Following completion of Phase 1, 10-15 AS participants who have reported both the best and worst psychological functioning will be invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Phase 2 will facilitate further exploration of the quantitative results and obtain a richer understanding of participants' personal interpretations of their illness and psychological wellbeing. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilise early baseline measures; include a healthy comparison group; calculate sample size through power calculations; and use a mixed methods approach to gain a deeper more holistic insight into the experiences of men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PROST CANC DIAGN TRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUR UROL S
[3]  
[Anonymous], INTERNET J EPIDEMIOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], STRUCT REV PAT REP O
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[6]   Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer [J].
Bailey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Wallace, Meredith ;
Mishel, Merle H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2007, 16 (04) :734-741
[7]   Measuring illness uncertainty in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer [J].
Bailey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Wallace, Meredith ;
Latini, David M. ;
Hegarty, Josephine ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Albertsen, Peter C. .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2011, 24 (04) :193-199
[8]   How Does Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Affect Quality of Life? A Systematic Review [J].
Bellardita, Lara ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
van den Bergh, Roderick ;
Randsdorp, Hans ;
Repetto, Claudia ;
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. ;
Lane, J. Athene ;
Korfage, Ida J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) :637-645
[9]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[10]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292